Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Dion Needs To Explain

Jack Layton and the NDP want to pull Canadian troops out of Afghanistan. It is a cowardly position to take, it ignores the successes that have been achieved so far, and it dooms the people of Afghanistan to a life of terror.

It makes no moral sense, but at least the position makes logical sense.

Stephane Dion has a different approach. He wants Canadian troops to stay in Afghanistan, and in particular, in the dangerous region of Kandahar, after February 2009, but demands that they stop fighting.

No more combat. Something short of combat called "security".

What does that mean?

Read more...

.....and while we are at it maybe he wants to touch base on this:

February 10, 2008

Stephane Dion: Against Ideology; For Heroin Addicts




1 comment:

  1. what's this I hear? The sound of Harper flip flopping?

    http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/02/12/afghan-motion.html

    My that really must sting Harper supporters. A positive development? It's only the same position the liberals have put forth pretty much from the beginning.

    And end to combat role, and a move to security and reconstruction.

    Meanwhile bloggers like you go on, and on, and on about Taliban Jack, and how clear Harper is.

    So what was Harper's position before???

    ReplyDelete