Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Verrrry Interesting...

Chris Selley: Welcome to Canada. DuMaurier or Players?
Posted: February 23, 2010, 4:58 PM by NP Editor
 
The Toronto Star reports: "The more 'Canadian' immigrant children become, the more likely they are to smoke, a new study warns."
Things the Star doesn't report:
  • The data derive from a single study of grade 4, 5 and 6 students "in 24 elementary schools located in multiethnic inner-city neighborhoods" in Montreal, and "may not be generalizable to children other than those living in [such neighbourhoods]."
  • The data were collected in 1993. Since that time, overall smoking rates in Canada have fallen by more than a third, meaning the percentage of child smokers reported by the Star as if it was current — around 30% — is almost certainly wildly inflated.
  • The definition of a child who "smokes," as defined by the Montreal researchers in 1993 and as described in the new study: "Children who had smoked but not in the past year, those who had smoked a couple of times in the last year, and those who smoked each month, each week, or every day."
National Post
cselley@nationalpost.com

Chris Selley: Welcome to Canada. DuMaurier or Players?

Posted: February 23, 2010, 4:58 PM by NP Editor
Filed under: Full Pundit,Chris Selley
The Toronto Star reports: "The more 'Canadian' immigrant children become, the more likely they are to smoke, a new study warns."
Things the Star doesn't report:
  • The data derive from a single study of grade 4, 5 and 6 students "in 24 elementary schools located in multiethnic inner-city neighborhoods" in Montreal, and "may not be generalizable to children other than those living in [such neighbourhoods]."
  • The data were collected in 1993. Since that time, overall smoking rates in Canada have fallen by more than a third, meaning the percentage of child smokers reported by the Star as if it was current — around 30% — is almost certainly wildly inflated.
  • The definition of a child who "smokes," as defined by the Montreal researchers in 1993 and as described in the new study: "Children who had smoked but not in the past year, those who had smoked a couple of times in the last year, and those who smoked each month, each week, or every day."
National Post
cselley@nationalpost.com

Chris Selley: Welcome to Canada. DuMaurier or Players?

Posted: February 23, 2010, 4:58 PM by NP Editor
Filed under: Full Pundit,Chris Selley
The Toronto Star reports: "The more 'Canadian' immigrant children become, the more likely they are to smoke, a new study warns."
Things the Star doesn't report:
  • The data derive from a single study of grade 4, 5 and 6 students "in 24 elementary schools located in multiethnic inner-city neighborhoods" in Montreal, and "may not be generalizable to children other than those living in [such neighbourhoods]."
  • The data were collected in 1993. Since that time, overall smoking rates in Canada have fallen by more than a third, meaning the percentage of child smokers reported by the Star as if it was current — around 30% — is almost certainly wildly inflated.
  • The definition of a child who "smokes," as defined by the Montreal researchers in 1993 and as described in the new study: "Children who had smoked but not in the past year, those who had smoked a couple of times in the last year, and those who smoked each month, each week, or every day."
National Post
cselley@nationalpost.com

Chris Selley: Welcome to Canada. DuMaurier or Players?

Posted: February 23, 2010, 4:58 PM by NP Editor
Filed under: Full Pundit,Chris Selley
The Toronto Star reports: "The more 'Canadian' immigrant children become, the more likely they are to smoke, a new study warns."
Things the Star doesn't report:
  • The data derive from a single study of grade 4, 5 and 6 students "in 24 elementary schools located in multiethnic inner-city neighborhoods" in Montreal, and "may not be generalizable to children other than those living in [such neighbourhoods]."
  • The data were collected in 1993. Since that time, overall smoking rates in Canada have fallen by more than a third, meaning the percentage of child smokers reported by the Star as if it was current — around 30% — is almost certainly wildly inflated.
  • The definition of a child who "smokes," as defined by the Montreal researchers in 1993 and as described in the new study: "Children who had smoked but not in the past year, those who had smoked a couple of times in the last year, and those who smoked each month, each week, or every day."
National Post
cselley@nationalpost.com

No comments:

Post a Comment