Using avoidance manoeuvres
By LORRIE GOLDSTEIN
Yesterday, in response to a couple of my recent columns about escalating gun crime, one of my regular readers -- "Ron in Kelowna" -- e-mailed asking why politicians propose such phony solutions as "banning handguns."
Incensed by calls from Toronto Mayor David Miller and Ontario Attorney General Michael Bryant for a "handgun ban" in the wake of an outbreak of gun and gang violence last weekend, including the murder of an 11-year-old boy, Ron asked, "Are they dense? Are they stubborn? Do they have some kind of vested interest in not solving violent crime?"
My answer is "no" to all three. I believe politicians propose simplistic solutions like "gun bans" because it's easier than telling people the truth -- that fighting gun crime is hard.
Calling for "banning handguns," particularly when you're asking a Conservative government in Ottawa to do it while you're a left-wing Toronto mayor or a Liberal provincial attorney general, is just an easy, partisan way to avoid responsibility and duck the issue.
This is also true for politicians on the right, who talk only about passing tougher laws against gun crime.
Actually, we don't need tougher laws. Our existing laws are plenty tough.
That is, they would be if judges used the sentences they provide to their full extent, which they don't.
Then, whatever sentence they do impose gets eroded by easy parole, assuming the case hasn't already been plea-bargained away by overworked Crown attorneys shovelling criminals through a justice system where there are too few courts and prisons to cope.
In Toronto, violent criminals often get double and triple credit for time served in custody before their trials upon a finding of guilt, because of trial delays and poor conditions in the jails where they're held pending trial.
Apparently, it's beyond the ability of our government to build some new jails, so that when a criminal who is held pending trial is convicted, he'll at least get only straight time for time served, not double or triple time.
Things are so bad that after a recent police bust of a major gang -- which had been planned for almost a year -- it took so long to get bail hearings for nine of the accused that the judge charged the attorney general's office (meaning taxpayers) $2,000 apiece to help pay their legal bills. Apparently, 11 months' advance warning wasn't enough for our government to figure out a way to hold timely bail hearings.
Public frustration with lax sentencing has become the political impetus for "mandatory minimum sentences" for gun crimes, such as those stuck in the Senate after being passed by the House of Commons.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper has accused the Liberals of stalling this bill and others (the Liberals say it's his fault), but even when this bill is passed, it won't make a difference.
Even judges who try to be tough on gun crime (and thus get overturned on appeal given the lax sentencing patterns established by their colleagues) see mandatory sentencing as an infringement on judicial independence.
In fact, mandatory minimums aren't a solution, since unenthusiastic judges and defence attorneys will find ways around them.
Indeed, in today's politically correct atmosphere, a politician who seriously wants to fight gun crime will be accused of interfering with the judiciary (for demanding judges take into account public concerns about gun violence), of being a racist (for demanding tougher bail and longer sentences since the criminals are disproportionately black), of being a fascist (for demanding the hiring of more cops and building more prisons) and finally, of being a bleeding heart and a spendthrift (for calling for massive new public spending, meaning higher taxes, to bolster public education, strengthen families and help find decent jobs for people jammed into urban ghettoes like Toronto's Jane-Finch).
Now, what are the chances we'll find a politician like that?
Better to treat the public like mushrooms. Keep them in the dark, cover them with manure and tell them "banning handguns" is the answer.
An Internet Fisherman who uses barbless hooks and this one dimensional world as a way of releasing the frustrations of daily life. This is my pond. You are welcome only if you are civil and contribute something to the ambiance. I reserve the right to ignore/publish/reject anon comments.
Thursday, July 26, 2007
Get Serious About Crime. The Existing Laws Allow It
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- Unhypentated Canadian
- I lean to the right but I still have a heart and if I have a mission it is to respond to attacks on people not available to protect themselves and to point out the hypocrisy of the left at every opportunity.MY MAJOR GOAL IS HIGHLIGHT THE HYPOCRISY AND STUPIDITY OF THE LEFTISTS ON TORONTO CITY COUNCIL. Last word: In the final analysis this blog is a relief valve for my rants/raves.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(3151)
-
▼
July
(249)
- Where Is The Hue & Cry From Nicotinenazis
- Slinger's Solution To Toronto's Fiscal Problems
- Readers Take The Star To Task
- The Question You Need To Answer Sid.......
- Freedom Of Information Is Not FREE
- Is Anyone Surprised At How Petty Miller's Lackeys ...
- Human Nature Makes This Wishful Thinking
- A Day In The Life Of Toronto
- Are We Getting Value For Our $$$$
- Boomers Take Credit For Eliminating Racism
- Kid Speaks Up About The Attitude Of Audlts/Parents
- Winnipeg Manitoba & Red River?
- Cam Wooley Gets Another One.........
- Grist For The Water Cooler Bloggers
- Bad Move Stephen But We Might Get To See How Minor...
- Ten Commandments Of Political Correctness
- Give Us A Break Terry.....We Are Not All Socialists
- Father Sky and Mother Earth Take Backseat To Daddy...
- Less Justice For The Criminals More Justice For Vi...
- Leave The Libraries Alone.....Go After Waste
- The Other Side Of Story Coming Out
- Another Broken Promis On Health Care
- Thugs Have A Code Of Life???????
- Lies, Damn Lies & Statistics
- Fiscal Management-TORONTO STYLE
- A Well Deserved Honor
- Common Threat Common Problem
- The Irony Shouldn't Be Forgotten In October
- A Victim Speaks Out
- I Support Climate Change BUT........
- June Veecock Hits The Nail Right On The Head
- Ban The Gun Advocates Versus Ban The Knife Advocates
- Time For An Attitude Change
- Cricket Club Concerned About Future Funding
- Let's Take Some Solace In The Accomplishments
- Thoughts On Gun Crime In Toronto
- Insight Into Why There Is Opposition To Giving Ind...
- Two Problems - One Solution
- Following In The Tradition Of Mel's Moose
- Seems To Be An Opinion Held By Many
- A Glimmer Of Hope
- This Will Really Piss Off Torontonians
- I Ask Again.......
- Would Things Be Different Today
- It Is May 6th 1937, The Place Is Toronto Island Ai...
- Drug Addiction Has Become A Cottage Industry
- Get Serious About Crime. The Existing Laws Allow It
- Vancouver Mayor Won't Sign Up For Union Card
- Are These Six Individuals Living In Your Neighborhood
- Seniors Still Part Of The Sexual MainstreamR
- Ephriam Brown Might Be Alive Today
- Some Facts On Handguns
- Fewer Police On The Streets, Less Public Transit, ...
- Why Are City Councillors Upset With Queen's Park
- The Fish Stinks At The Head
- At Least Innocents Won't Get Caught In Crossfire
- Being A Scofflawer Can Get Expensive
- Why Is Extended Human Rights Legislation So Conten...
- Where Did My Taxes Go Over The Last 50 Years
- Magic Trick...Making Your Money Disappear
- If There Is A Supreme Being This Would Be Poetic J...
- It Is A Two Way Street
- Stay Ahead Of The Trend And Your Friends
- Got A Few Extra $$$$$ Buy Taco Bell Stock
- The following are the COMMENTS on the Free Dominio...
- From The Right Thinker..........
- Does Toronto Board Of Health Have This Epidemic On...
- Men charged in shooting have criminal past <!--no...
- Kids Are Not Being Murdered In Stephen Harper's Ne...
- Contrary To The Mayor's Hype There Are More Than S...
- Harris Bashing Has Become A Blood Sport
- Preparing Your Kid To Play In FIFA
- Adult Content.
- Thanks LG. You Summarize What I Have Been Saying F...
- Lost In The Soccer Melee
- Do We Blame Soccer Moms
- Let's See What Ann Is Up To.......
- Going Hand In Hand
- Those Who Voted For Deferral Failed The Voters
- Fear Mongering Tactics Not Working
- When Will Mayor Miller Get Some Balls
- Is It A Fair Comparison
- Saturday Night In A World Class City
- Go West Transit Rider, Go West...........
- Here Is A Spokesman For The People The Mayor Serve...
- Good Luck Vanessa
- A Slice Of Lemon.......
- A Few Quick Ones
- Congratulations To The Homeless
- I Have Always Believed The Same Thing.......
- TAKE ON THE UNIONS....It will never happen
- City Councilors See $6M+ As Chump Change
- Big Mac & Fries Versus Bread & Water
- Us Loudmouths Appreciate The Sun's Company
- Downside Of DIY (Do It Yourself)
- A Bonus For Borderline Environmentalists
- Micheal Coren Is Not The Only "Target"
- The Real David Miller Exposed
- Vacation At Home.......
- Election Times A'Coming, Election Times A'Coming.....
-
▼
July
(249)
3 comments:
I see a whole lot of talk,, sop box grandstanding, but no real substance. Honestly, I have asked this question several times. Do we really believe that keeping these perps behind bars is going to solve gun crime? Did it work for the US???
Now, please read my question very carefully. I did not ask whether we should keep these perps behind bars longer. I asked if it will help solve our gun crime.
I have said this before, banning handguns, will have about the same effectiveness as toughening sentencing for violent criminals.
So this yammering back and forth as to whether the liberals (damn them!) or the tories (good god!) are right.
meanwhile, people are dying.
You question has been answered but you must of missed it....keeping them behind bars, not in traditonal day camps but in gulag type camps, longer will make it safer simply because they are not on the street. A side effect will be that those prone to carry restricted weapons might have second thoughts if they know they will have to pay the price.
The gulags would be in the harshest part of the country and each camp will have an equal representation from each gang so they can console themselves, recruit new members or possibly be instrumental in reducing the number of gang members.
Bottom line......there is no practical solution to "gun crime" but we recognize that it is a potential danger to citizenry at large and that is the reason we have laws that are supposed to deal with those that break the law so quit looking for solutions and apply the law. You does the crime You does the time.
Post a Comment