
An Internet Fisherman who uses barbless hooks and this one dimensional world as a way of releasing the frustrations of daily life. This is my pond. You are welcome only if you are civil and contribute something to the ambiance. I reserve the right to ignore/publish/reject anon comments.
Showing posts with label Going Green $$$$. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Going Green $$$$. Show all posts
Friday, March 02, 2012
Would Oil Sand Fuel Be Cheaper?
Labels:
Going Green $$$$,
Green Con Job,
Obama
Monday, January 30, 2012
A Must Read For McGoonty, Harper...



Stimulus-Backed ‘Green’ Bankruptcy of the Week: Ener1
Ontario approves 40 large green-energy projects - Moneyville.ca
...The new wind projects will get 13.5 cents a kilowatt hour for their power, while the solar operators will receive 44.3 cents a kilowatt hour.
...currently cost per kw/hr:
Energy Retailer 5-Year Fixed Price
Bullfrog Power
Retail Price+ 3 cents/kWh
Separate bill for 3 cents/kWh for "greening" your energy. Global Adjustment won't apply if you are still an RPP customer.
Canada Energy Wholesalers
5.5 cents/kWh
You pay their wholesale cost plus 0.8 cents/kWh with a price cap of 5.5 cents/kWh over the 5 years
Direct Energy
6.99 cents/kWh
They only seem to offer 3 year contracts
MyRate Energy
7.09 cents/kWh
Ontario approves 40 large green-energy projects - Moneyville.ca
...The new wind projects will get 13.5 cents a kilowatt hour for their power, while the solar operators will receive 44.3 cents a kilowatt hour.
...currently cost per kw/hr:
Energy Retailer 5-Year Fixed Price
Bullfrog Power
Retail Price+ 3 cents/kWh
Separate bill for 3 cents/kWh for "greening" your energy. Global Adjustment won't apply if you are still an RPP customer.
Canada Energy Wholesalers
5.5 cents/kWh
You pay their wholesale cost plus 0.8 cents/kWh with a price cap of 5.5 cents/kWh over the 5 years
Direct Energy
6.99 cents/kWh
They only seem to offer 3 year contracts
MyRate Energy
7.09 cents/kWh
Labels:
Going Green $$$$,
Gore/Suziki,
Green Con Job,
Green Plan
Monday, January 09, 2012
Gore/Suziki/McGinty Con Job...

Greenbot's, are you sitting down?
Okay, here's the bombshell. The volcanic eruption in Iceland, since its first spewing of volcanic ash has, in just FOUR DAYS, NEGATED EVERY SINGLE EFFORT you have made in the past five years to control CO2 emissions on our planet, all of you.Of course you know about this evil carbon dioxide that we are trying to suppress it's that vital chemical compound that every plant requires to live and grow, and to synthesize into oxygen for us humans, and all animal life.I know, it's very disheartening to realize that all of the carbon emission savings you have accomplished while suffering the inconvenience and expense of: driving Prius hybrids, buying fabric grocery bags, sitting up till midnight to finish your kid's "The Green Revolution" science project, throwing out all of your non-green cleaning supplies, using only two squares of toilet paper, putting a brick in your toilet tank reservoir, selling your SUV and speedboat, vacationing at home instead of abroad, nearly getting hit every day on your bicycle, replacing all of your 50 cents light bulbs with $10.00 light bulbs...well, all of those things you have done have all gone down the tubes in just four days.The volcanic ash emitted into the Earth's atmosphere in just four days - yes - FOUR DAYS ONLY by that volcano in Iceland, has totally erased every single effort you have made to reduce the evil beast, carbon. And there are around 200 active volcanoes on the planet spewing out this crud any one time - EVERY DAY.
Posted by Rob at 9:47 PM Comments (32)
Okay, here's the bombshell. The volcanic eruption in Iceland, since its first spewing of volcanic ash has, in just FOUR DAYS, NEGATED EVERY SINGLE EFFORT you have made in the past five years to control CO2 emissions on our planet, all of you.Of course you know about this evil carbon dioxide that we are trying to suppress it's that vital chemical compound that every plant requires to live and grow, and to synthesize into oxygen for us humans, and all animal life.I know, it's very disheartening to realize that all of the carbon emission savings you have accomplished while suffering the inconvenience and expense of: driving Prius hybrids, buying fabric grocery bags, sitting up till midnight to finish your kid's "The Green Revolution" science project, throwing out all of your non-green cleaning supplies, using only two squares of toilet paper, putting a brick in your toilet tank reservoir, selling your SUV and speedboat, vacationing at home instead of abroad, nearly getting hit every day on your bicycle, replacing all of your 50 cents light bulbs with $10.00 light bulbs...well, all of those things you have done have all gone down the tubes in just four days.The volcanic ash emitted into the Earth's atmosphere in just four days - yes - FOUR DAYS ONLY by that volcano in Iceland, has totally erased every single effort you have made to reduce the evil beast, carbon. And there are around 200 active volcanoes on the planet spewing out this crud any one time - EVERY DAY.
Posted by Rob at 9:47 PM Comments (32)
Sunday, October 02, 2011
If You Are Leaning Toward McGinty
...the following might give you some insight into McGinty's Green Energy Act. which promotes the manufacture and installation of wind turbines and the like. ("The single best green energy program on the North American continent," according to no less an authority than Al Gore.)
Solar Energy School Propaganda 101
By Michelle Malkin • September 30, 2011 12:01 AM
We Don't Need No Stinking Giant Mirrors
Via Walter Russell Mead;
Solar-power equipment manufacturer Stirling Energy Systems Inc. has filed for bankruptcy, adding to a wave of troubles in the solar industry amid soft demand, falling prices and difficulty raising money. [… ] Both [of the company’s plants] were sited on public land in California and obtained fast-track construction pemits from the Obama administration.
Mead notes ...
But there’s another factor behind the failure of so many Obama administration initiatives in this field. Because alternative energy generation is expensive and inefficient, it requires some combination of subsidies, high energy prices and forced purchases to make these investments pay off.
I remember the days when SDA was a lonely incandescent bulb of green energy truth, lighting a path through the blogosphere wilderness. Nowadays, it seems everyone's jumping on the bandwagon. Still, when you read the word "investments" in a sentence like that above, one realizes there's still work to be done. (h/t Instapundit)
Posted by Kate at 3:32 PM
Comments (30)
Let's Talk Politics - This doesn't compute, but then I have a ...
On my way home from CO, I drove past a shut down windmill farm in NM, AND a shut ... Dalton McGinty [Ontario's premier] signed ludicrous contracts with some big name "green ...
letstalkpolitics.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=fuel&...
Solar Energy School Propaganda 101
By Michelle Malkin • September 30, 2011 12:01 AM
We Don't Need No Stinking Giant Mirrors
Via Walter Russell Mead;
Solar-power equipment manufacturer Stirling Energy Systems Inc. has filed for bankruptcy, adding to a wave of troubles in the solar industry amid soft demand, falling prices and difficulty raising money. [… ] Both [of the company’s plants] were sited on public land in California and obtained fast-track construction pemits from the Obama administration.
Mead notes ...
But there’s another factor behind the failure of so many Obama administration initiatives in this field. Because alternative energy generation is expensive and inefficient, it requires some combination of subsidies, high energy prices and forced purchases to make these investments pay off.
I remember the days when SDA was a lonely incandescent bulb of green energy truth, lighting a path through the blogosphere wilderness. Nowadays, it seems everyone's jumping on the bandwagon. Still, when you read the word "investments" in a sentence like that above, one realizes there's still work to be done. (h/t Instapundit)
Posted by Kate at 3:32 PM
Comments (30)
Let's Talk Politics - This doesn't compute, but then I have a ...
On my way home from CO, I drove past a shut down windmill farm in NM, AND a shut ... Dalton McGinty [Ontario's premier] signed ludicrous contracts with some big name "green ...
letstalkpolitics.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=fuel&...
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Gore, Suzuki And ...
Dalton leads the Stupid Green Men
With apologies to Michael Moore, there’s only way to describe Premier Dalton McGuinty and the Liberals when it comes to their absurd claims about the job- creation potential of renewable energy.
27 Full story
With apologies to Michael Moore, there’s only way to describe Premier Dalton McGuinty and the Liberals when it comes to their absurd claims about the job- creation potential of renewable energy.
27 Full story
Saturday, September 03, 2011
Read The CBC Debunking Of Similar Claims By Hannah...
Naomi Klein, natives arrested at White House
WASHINGTON - A Canadian native protester and social activist Naomi Klein were among dozens arrested Friday outside the White House near the end of a two-week civil disobedience campaign aimed at pressuring U.S. President Barack Obama to block TransCanada's proposed Keystone XL pipeline. 2 September
...is it possible the natives in attendance are not getting any of $$$.
WASHINGTON - A Canadian native protester and social activist Naomi Klein were among dozens arrested Friday outside the White House near the end of a two-week civil disobedience campaign aimed at pressuring U.S. President Barack Obama to block TransCanada's proposed Keystone XL pipeline. 2 September
...is it possible the natives in attendance are not getting any of $$$.
Another Expert From Gore/Suzuki University Debunked...
Examining 5 oilsands claims by Daryl Hannah
02/09/2011 2:46:27 PM
CBC News
Actress and activist Darryl Hannah was arrested this week in Washington D.C during a protest against TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline. CBC News investigates some of the actress's claims about Canada's oilsands.
On Wednesday, Hannah appeared on CBC's Power & Politics to debate Alykhan Velshi, founder of Ethicaloil.org, a website devoted to defending Canada's oil industry.
Velshi said it wasn't fair to compare the first Keystone pipeline, which had a number of high-profile leaks, with Keystone XL. He said that was like using the bad engineering of the Ford Pinto (a car produced in the '70s) to say Fords shouldn't be built today. (Though Hannah quickly pointed out that the first pipeline was only a year old).
For the most part, Velshi stuck to his main argument - that the U.S. will continue to need oil and should be supplied from "friendly" countries like Canada, instead of "conflict regimes" like Saudi Arabia and Venezuela.
But Hannah made a number of claims about the oilsands, some of which CBC News investigated:
Claim 1.: "It's well-documented that the tar sands itself is one of the world's largest ecological atrocities and disasters."
The Royal Society of Canada (RSC) released a 414-page report last year entitled Environmental and Health Impacts of Canada's Oil Sands Industry. It was written by scientists and academics and targeted oil companies, the federal and provincial government and environmentalists.
While the report does not examine whether the oilsands is one of the worst ecological disasters, it does address the question of whether it is "the most environmentally destructive project on earth."
The report compares the oilsands to a number of other industries. In terms of toxic emissions, for example, it says the oilsands industry ranks fifth for mercury, sixth for cadmium, eighth for lead and eighth for four carcinogenic pollutants.
The industry would have to increase its emissions by five-fold to become the first ranked industrial emitter of air pollutants and toxic emissions, the RSC said, something "no foreseeable oilsands growth scenario" would lead to.
The academic group also found that no evidence had been demonstrated that the industry is a major polluter of surface waters, although groundwater is less certain.
They did note the substantial impact of open pit surface mining and a need for more rapid reclamation of disturbed areas. But they said "the claim by some critics of the oil sands industry that it is the most environmentally destructive project on earth is not supported by the evidence."
Claim 2.: "The contribution to the carbon in the atmosphere is unprecedented."
The report acknowledges reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the oil sands poses a challenge to Canada and that the industry is the country's fastest growing source.
But it said the oilsands makes up about five per cent of the country's total emissions, compared with 16 per cent for fossil fuel-fired power generation and 27 per cent for transportation, based on 2008 data.
In terms of global emissions, the oilsands contributes .08 per cent. the report found.
Claim 3: "I've been hearing about how many people have cancer that live downstream from the tar sands project."
Hannah is referring to the residents of Fort Chipewyan who live downstream from the oilsands. Concerns were first raised in 2006 by a local doctor about supposed elevated cancer rates in the town. In 2009, the Alberta Cancer Board said cancer rates were 30 per cent higher than expected.
But the RSC report noted that the doctor was later criticized by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta for making "a number of inaccurate and untruthful claims."
International experts who looked at the Alberta Cancer Board study also found that the increase in cancer incidence was not evidence that an environmental exposure was the cause.
"There is currently no credible evidence of environmental contaminant exposures from oilsands reaching Fort Chipewyan at levels expected to cause human cancer rates."
However, the Alberta government has said it will further study the issue.
Claim 4: "It has poisoned every one who's lived downstream from it."
The report found that "environmental contaminants at current levels of exposure are unlikely to cause major health impact for the general population." It added that projected emissions from expanded operations are not likely to change that expectation.
Claim 5. "TransCanada, who's building this pipeline has told people in [the U.S.] that they're going to be taking their land through eminent domain if they don't agree to the terms."
Hannah is referring to TransCanada's threat to go to court to expropriate parts of U.S. land from landowners who oppose the Keystone XL pipeline on their property.
While the company has said it's trying to work out agreements with the landowners, it has admitted it would go to court as a "last resort" to force a deal.
TransCanada spokesman Terry Cunha told The Associated Press in April that landowners who agree to easements with TransCanada will receive payment when they sign the agreement, and Cunha said landowners would keep the money even if the project isn't approved. Plus, the ranchers and farmers retain ownership of the land.
With files from The Associated Press
02/09/2011 2:46:27 PM
CBC News
Actress and activist Darryl Hannah was arrested this week in Washington D.C during a protest against TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline. CBC News investigates some of the actress's claims about Canada's oilsands.
On Wednesday, Hannah appeared on CBC's Power & Politics to debate Alykhan Velshi, founder of Ethicaloil.org, a website devoted to defending Canada's oil industry.
Velshi said it wasn't fair to compare the first Keystone pipeline, which had a number of high-profile leaks, with Keystone XL. He said that was like using the bad engineering of the Ford Pinto (a car produced in the '70s) to say Fords shouldn't be built today. (Though Hannah quickly pointed out that the first pipeline was only a year old).
For the most part, Velshi stuck to his main argument - that the U.S. will continue to need oil and should be supplied from "friendly" countries like Canada, instead of "conflict regimes" like Saudi Arabia and Venezuela.
But Hannah made a number of claims about the oilsands, some of which CBC News investigated:
Claim 1.: "It's well-documented that the tar sands itself is one of the world's largest ecological atrocities and disasters."
The Royal Society of Canada (RSC) released a 414-page report last year entitled Environmental and Health Impacts of Canada's Oil Sands Industry. It was written by scientists and academics and targeted oil companies, the federal and provincial government and environmentalists.
While the report does not examine whether the oilsands is one of the worst ecological disasters, it does address the question of whether it is "the most environmentally destructive project on earth."
The report compares the oilsands to a number of other industries. In terms of toxic emissions, for example, it says the oilsands industry ranks fifth for mercury, sixth for cadmium, eighth for lead and eighth for four carcinogenic pollutants.
The industry would have to increase its emissions by five-fold to become the first ranked industrial emitter of air pollutants and toxic emissions, the RSC said, something "no foreseeable oilsands growth scenario" would lead to.
The academic group also found that no evidence had been demonstrated that the industry is a major polluter of surface waters, although groundwater is less certain.
They did note the substantial impact of open pit surface mining and a need for more rapid reclamation of disturbed areas. But they said "the claim by some critics of the oil sands industry that it is the most environmentally destructive project on earth is not supported by the evidence."
Claim 2.: "The contribution to the carbon in the atmosphere is unprecedented."
The report acknowledges reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the oil sands poses a challenge to Canada and that the industry is the country's fastest growing source.
But it said the oilsands makes up about five per cent of the country's total emissions, compared with 16 per cent for fossil fuel-fired power generation and 27 per cent for transportation, based on 2008 data.
In terms of global emissions, the oilsands contributes .08 per cent. the report found.
Claim 3: "I've been hearing about how many people have cancer that live downstream from the tar sands project."
Hannah is referring to the residents of Fort Chipewyan who live downstream from the oilsands. Concerns were first raised in 2006 by a local doctor about supposed elevated cancer rates in the town. In 2009, the Alberta Cancer Board said cancer rates were 30 per cent higher than expected.
But the RSC report noted that the doctor was later criticized by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta for making "a number of inaccurate and untruthful claims."
International experts who looked at the Alberta Cancer Board study also found that the increase in cancer incidence was not evidence that an environmental exposure was the cause.
"There is currently no credible evidence of environmental contaminant exposures from oilsands reaching Fort Chipewyan at levels expected to cause human cancer rates."
However, the Alberta government has said it will further study the issue.
Claim 4: "It has poisoned every one who's lived downstream from it."
The report found that "environmental contaminants at current levels of exposure are unlikely to cause major health impact for the general population." It added that projected emissions from expanded operations are not likely to change that expectation.
Claim 5. "TransCanada, who's building this pipeline has told people in [the U.S.] that they're going to be taking their land through eminent domain if they don't agree to the terms."
Hannah is referring to TransCanada's threat to go to court to expropriate parts of U.S. land from landowners who oppose the Keystone XL pipeline on their property.
While the company has said it's trying to work out agreements with the landowners, it has admitted it would go to court as a "last resort" to force a deal.
TransCanada spokesman Terry Cunha told The Associated Press in April that landowners who agree to easements with TransCanada will receive payment when they sign the agreement, and Cunha said landowners would keep the money even if the project isn't approved. Plus, the ranchers and farmers retain ownership of the land.
With files from The Associated Press
Labels:
Darryl Hannah,
Going Green $$$$,
Gore/Suziki,
Green Con Job,
Green Shit
Thursday, April 14, 2011
The Greening By Red Mayor...
The latest leftover bull from David Miller
By SUE-ANN LEVY, City Hall Columnist
Let’s call it the latest bit of bull left over from the Days of David Miller.
Bullfrog Power facts
Reviewing the green wave
Labels:
Going Green $$$$,
Green Con Job,
Green Shit
Saturday, March 26, 2011
A Birthday Gift From Diver Suscooky...
Labels:
Going Green $$$$,
Gore/Suzuki,
Green Con Job,
Green Shit
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Don't Tell Me You Don't Need It.....
Labels:
Going Green $$$$,
Gore/Suzuki,
Green Con Job
What Did You Do To Piss Off Mother Nature?
Labels:
Going Green $$$$,
Gore/Suziki,
Green Con Job,
Mother Nature
Sunday, January 02, 2011
The Real Message Is Create A Vast Market For Re-usable Bags...
Plastic bags: Keep the nickel fee
Sun Jan 2 2011
Toronto's bag "tax" sends a useful message that society frowns on needless waste.
Sun Jan 2 2011
Toronto's bag "tax" sends a useful message that society frowns on needless waste.
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Facing Reality...
Labels:
Going Green $$$$,
Green Con Job,
Green Holy Grail
Monday, December 06, 2010
Pray Should Have Been Directed To The Green God...
Next prayer’s to you, Al. I promiseUN Climate Summit Leader Prays to Mayan Moon Goddess
December 3, 2010 03:45 PM by Doug Powers
60 Comments
7 Trackbacks
Labels:
Going Green $$$$,
Gore,
Green Con Job
Thursday, November 25, 2010
Anoth Green Saviour Shows Their Prioritis...
November 25, 2010
Y2Kyoto: Scene From A David Suzuki Book Signing
On Nov. 20 Jenn Carson went to see David Suzuki speak in Moncton;
I was hoping to ask him during the question period that normally follows these types of talks for advice on how to help me promote environmentalism to my group of largely apathetic students at Hampton High School, where I am the librarian.
Unfortunately, there was no question period. Directly following Dr. Suzuki's speech, where he emphatically urged the audience to form strong interpersonal connections with their neighbours, family and local ecology, there was a book signing. I waited until the line was gone before I approached. I did not purchase any books, since I either have them at home, or have read them through our public library service. There was only one other man at the table, talking about a Prius, and he stopped and said he should go since I was waiting. Dr. Suzuki said it was alright since there was "no one there."
I assumed since he was 75, perhaps his eyesight was poor and he did not see me. When the man left, I approached Dr. Suzuki.
He looked up and said, "book?" I said I didn't have one but I wanted to ask him a question. He said, "I don't have time for that," and waved me away like a king dismissing a commoner.
There was absolutely no one else around the table except the security guards.
Then he shouted out, "Books! Books!" and continued waving me out of the way. There was no sign indicating no questions were allowed.
Only minutes before he had been espousing the value of slowing down and making time for each other and he didn't even have the decency to say, "I'm sorry, I'm tired . . . or I'm not allowed to answer questions . . ."
Instead here I was, an educator and great promoter of his books, looking for help with the generation he claimed was most important, but because I was not spending money (other than the $45 I spent to hear him lecture), I was waved off.
I used to be proud to call Dr. Suzuki one of my heroes, and now I can see that he is a hypocrite.
I am in no way turned off the environmental causes I have always believed in, simply disappointed to have to tell my students, once again, that celebrity and integrity seem to be mutually exclusive.
Jenn Carson,
Hampton
Welcome to the club, Jenn!
ht Robert in Calgary
Posted by Kate
Y2Kyoto: Scene From A David Suzuki Book Signing
On Nov. 20 Jenn Carson went to see David Suzuki speak in Moncton;
I was hoping to ask him during the question period that normally follows these types of talks for advice on how to help me promote environmentalism to my group of largely apathetic students at Hampton High School, where I am the librarian.
Unfortunately, there was no question period. Directly following Dr. Suzuki's speech, where he emphatically urged the audience to form strong interpersonal connections with their neighbours, family and local ecology, there was a book signing. I waited until the line was gone before I approached. I did not purchase any books, since I either have them at home, or have read them through our public library service. There was only one other man at the table, talking about a Prius, and he stopped and said he should go since I was waiting. Dr. Suzuki said it was alright since there was "no one there."
I assumed since he was 75, perhaps his eyesight was poor and he did not see me. When the man left, I approached Dr. Suzuki.
He looked up and said, "book?" I said I didn't have one but I wanted to ask him a question. He said, "I don't have time for that," and waved me away like a king dismissing a commoner.
There was absolutely no one else around the table except the security guards.
Then he shouted out, "Books! Books!" and continued waving me out of the way. There was no sign indicating no questions were allowed.
Only minutes before he had been espousing the value of slowing down and making time for each other and he didn't even have the decency to say, "I'm sorry, I'm tired . . . or I'm not allowed to answer questions . . ."
Instead here I was, an educator and great promoter of his books, looking for help with the generation he claimed was most important, but because I was not spending money (other than the $45 I spent to hear him lecture), I was waved off.
I used to be proud to call Dr. Suzuki one of my heroes, and now I can see that he is a hypocrite.
I am in no way turned off the environmental causes I have always believed in, simply disappointed to have to tell my students, once again, that celebrity and integrity seem to be mutually exclusive.
Jenn Carson,
Hampton
Welcome to the club, Jenn!
ht Robert in Calgary
Posted by Kate
Tuesday, November 02, 2010
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
New Version Of "I Am Selling Some Land In Florida..."
Nearly all "green" consumer products make one false, misleading or unproven environmental claim to attract eco-conscious shoppers, a new study has found.
Labels:
Con Job,
Going Green $$$$,
Gore/Suzuki,
Green Holy Grail
Hail Gore And Suzuki...
Study finds most 'green product' claims misleading
Nearly all "green" consumer products make one false, misleading or unproven environmental claim to attract eco-conscious shoppers, a new study has found.
REDUCING ENVIRONMENTAL FOOTPRINT THE RIGHT THING TO DO
Nearly all "green" consumer products make one false, misleading or unproven environmental claim to attract eco-conscious shoppers, a new study has found.
REDUCING ENVIRONMENTAL FOOTPRINT THE RIGHT THING TO DO
Labels:
Con Game,
Going Green $$$$,
Gore/Suzuki,
Green Holy Grail
Sunday, August 01, 2010
Green Holy Grail...
David Frum: Two countries, one carbon tax
David Frum July 31, 2010 – 9:00 am
A loophole Canada once demanded in the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement now threatens to bite the Canadian energy industry.
The loophole allows either country to impose tariffs on the other for health and environmental reasons. Now, that loophole creates an opportunity for the United States to impose sanctions on oil from Canada’s oil sands.
Here’s how. Read More »
The loophole allows either country to impose tariffs on the other for health and environmental reasons. Now, that loophole creates an opportunity for the United States to impose sanctions on oil from Canada’s oil sands.
Here’s how. Read More »
...talking about elephants:
Margaret Wente
Taming my elephant – and yours
Just when you think you’ve got the beast of irrationality under control, he goes on the rampage again
Labels:
Going Green $$$$,
Green Plan,
Green Sacrifice,
Green Shit
Thursday, July 29, 2010
GM Abandons Windsor BUT...
FP’s Peter Foster: The Voltswagen — The people’s car the people pay for
Peter Foster July 28, 2010 – 8:01 pm
Like the Apollo program, the Volt is massively expensive, and pointless
Ontario taxpayers should be grateful that the Chevy Volt is not due to appear in the province until next year. Put together a $10,000-per-car provincial subsidy with ultra high-cost solar electricity foisted on the public via feed-in tariffs and you have a level of economic insanity it would be hard to match. Indeed, perhaps the Volt should be renamed “The McGuinty” for the Canadian market. It would take the pressure off the memory of poor Edsel Ford, who gave his name to a tail-finned lemon.
GM announced this week that the Volt, as expected, would cost US$41,000, more than a loaded Cadillac. It will still lose money. GM’s marketing chief, Joel Ewanick, when revealing the price, said the Volt was “starting the world on a different path.” Would that be The Road to Serfdom? But let’s not go over the top. The Volt will collapse under the weight of its own pointless non-viability. GM’s future lies with new conventional fuel-powered models such as the Buick Regal, which by all accounts is a terrific car. The Volt is pure politics.
Read more
Ontario taxpayers should be grateful that the Chevy Volt is not due to appear in the province until next year. Put together a $10,000-per-car provincial subsidy with ultra high-cost solar electricity foisted on the public via feed-in tariffs and you have a level of economic insanity it would be hard to match. Indeed, perhaps the Volt should be renamed “The McGuinty” for the Canadian market. It would take the pressure off the memory of poor Edsel Ford, who gave his name to a tail-finned lemon.
GM announced this week that the Volt, as expected, would cost US$41,000, more than a loaded Cadillac. It will still lose money. GM’s marketing chief, Joel Ewanick, when revealing the price, said the Volt was “starting the world on a different path.” Would that be The Road to Serfdom? But let’s not go over the top. The Volt will collapse under the weight of its own pointless non-viability. GM’s future lies with new conventional fuel-powered models such as the Buick Regal, which by all accounts is a terrific car. The Volt is pure politics.
Read more
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
About Me
- Unhypentated Canadian
- I lean to the right but I still have a heart and if I have a mission it is to respond to attacks on people not available to protect themselves and to point out the hypocrisy of the left at every opportunity.MY MAJOR GOAL IS HIGHLIGHT THE HYPOCRISY AND STUPIDITY OF THE LEFTISTS ON TORONTO CITY COUNCIL. Last word: In the final analysis this blog is a relief valve for my rants/raves.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2014
(1131)
-
▼
August
(83)
- THATS WYNNER NIBBLING ON YOUR EAR...
- FORGET THE FACTS! WHITEY HAS TO BE GUILTY...
- FOR SHAME, FOR SHAME...
- OKAY CLASS...
- GOOD LUCK CHARLIE MILQUEST...
- LIKEN IT TO AN ITCHY CROTCH
- ULTIMATE OXYMORONIC...
- The "BIG GUY" DESERVES A FEW LAFFS...
- LET'S STAY ON HIS CASE...
- SNEAKING INTO THE LONGHOUSE NOT RESTRICTED TO "FIR...
- EVERYONE has own special one...
- R.I.P. DOESN'T BEGIN TO EXPRESS FEELINGS
- CNE/PAN AM DEBACLE?
- WHICH WILL YOU REMEMBER?
- NUT DOESN'T FALL FAR FROM TEAM...
- OBAMA RETURNING TO ROOTS???
- good morning gary...
- A QUICK PEEK INTO ANTI- GROUPS...
- GOOD TO SEE YOU BACK CHRISTIE...
- A MUST, MUST, MUST....READ
- DIVERSITY DIVERSITY DIVERSITY...
- ARE WE WINNERS IN OUR CHINA TRADE DEAL?
- WYNNER Tapping McGoonty VASELINE Reserve
- WYNNER'S NOT WHINING.
- BUT HE IS A GOOD "OL BOY...
- IT HAS BCOME A TRADITION!
- OH WELL...ENJOY!
- OOPS! SORRY THIS HAS NO CONNECTION TO TTC...
- TORSTAR HAVE FILED ADOPTION PAPERS FOR FORD BROS.
- THE CHAMPIONS OF THE MCGOONTY/WYNNER CLIQUE...
- NO LONGER
- IT IS "THE RESIDENTS" COMPLACENCY...
- WILL SUNMEDIA POST A COPY?
- VALID QUESTIONS AND YOU CAN ADD...
- MOTHER NATURE PISSED OFF...
- REALITY CATCHING UP TO US,,,
- SELF GOVERNMENT AT IT'S FINEST...
- NUT SEASON IS COMING...
- A Difficult Choice BUT
- Grt ALL The Facts Before Taking A Stand...
- G'Day Rex...
- PAT SAJAK DISEMINATES TRUTH/REALITY TROLLS
- WE KNEW THERE WAS A PUNGENT ODOUR AT SILLY HALL...
- WHO DOESN'T?
- Degree In Social Work...
- Who Are THEY???
- Who Are THEY?
- VACATING WASHING FOR FUN & PLEASURE...
- CLEAN OUT THE BASEMENT...
- PASS THE CUP AROUND YOUR LOCAL TIMMIES/STARBUSKS, ...
- WANDERING IN THE TORONTO WILDERNESS...
- SHAKE YOUR HEAD BUT GET OUT AND VOTE...
- GUESS WHO WILL BE FIRST UP AGAINST WALL...
- FRESHNESS OF REALITY BY...
- NO1 NO1 NO1...
- TODAY'S ICE CREME...
- TRULY CANADIAN (THANK GAWD...)
- NOT PARENTING...
- CURB LANE BANDITS...
- WHERE WERE "PROTESTERS:"
- IT COULD BE TOO LATE...
- THE LEFT KNOWS HOW TO MAKE SOMETHING OBTUSE AN ISSUE
- WYNER PERCEPTIONS
- THE LEFT IS STARTING TO GOOSE STEP IN TORONTO...
- TORONTO POLITICS...
- HO HUM!
- Where Is The Outrage...
- HAPPY SIMCOE DAY
- YOUR FUTURE......
- LET'S FACE REALITY...
- A SUCCESS STORY...
- OUTLIVED IT'S PURPOSE DECADES AGO...
- Let's NOT Forget The MEDIAS contribution...
- Do YOU Care...
- THE BANNERS ARE DIFFERENT...
- DOES ANYONE BUT THE MEDIA CARE?
- WHERE PART OF YOUR GAS TAX GOES...
- Logic NOT Part Of Toronto Motto
- WHO NEEDS AN ELECTION?
- NOT QUALIFIED FOR MACdONALDS???
- ...
- WILL SATISFY MANY VOTERS...
- Hmmm...
-
▼
August
(83)












