An Internet Fisherman who uses barbless hooks and this one dimensional world as a way of releasing the frustrations of daily life. This is my pond. You are welcome only if you are civil and contribute something to the ambiance. I reserve the right to ignore/publish/reject anon comments.
Showing posts with label Ann Coulter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ann Coulter. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 05, 2011
The Modern Anne Oakley...
Michael Moore: ‘Capitalism destroyed my town’ — except he grew up in suburbia, not Flint…
By Kathy Shaidle on Tuesday, October 4th, 2011
No Comments
Ann Coulter has had it with your bullshit.
Progressive of Pallor on pointless paradBy Michelle Malkin • October 4, 2011 05:01 PMe
Winter Is Coming...Social In-Activists (Protestors) Will Be...
...retreating to the closest Starbucks, California, etc. where the climate is more conducive to saving the world.
October 5, 2011
More Observations of the Wall Street "Protests"
Monsieur Provocateur vs. an Elderly Jewish Man - h/t EBD
Ann Coulter discusses the "protests" - h/t Lucky Lori
Perhaps most enlightening of all is this interview with Lloyd Hart, author of the Occupy Wall Street Demands post. I have little doubt that Mr. Hart deeply believes what he's saying. The fact that he has NO CLUE into human character provides a valuable teaching moment into what precisely is wrong with the Leftist mindset ... and why Leftist public policies almost always end up in abject failure.
Posted by Robert at 2:02 AM
Comments (0)
October 5, 2011
More Observations of the Wall Street "Protests"
Monsieur Provocateur vs. an Elderly Jewish Man - h/t EBD
Ann Coulter discusses the "protests" - h/t Lucky Lori
Perhaps most enlightening of all is this interview with Lloyd Hart, author of the Occupy Wall Street Demands post. I have little doubt that Mr. Hart deeply believes what he's saying. The fact that he has NO CLUE into human character provides a valuable teaching moment into what precisely is wrong with the Leftist mindset ... and why Leftist public policies almost always end up in abject failure.
Posted by Robert at 2:02 AM
Comments (0)
Sunday, July 31, 2011
Kathy Doesn't Mince Words...
Muslim calls Mark Steyn a ‘racist’ on TV (video)
By Kathy Shaidle on Saturday, July 30th, 2011
No Comments
And calls for media censorship — so: you first, asshole!
This man represents everything that is wrong with Canada today.
And I’m obliged to help pay for his bullshit, through my extorted tax dollars. (Don’t tell me that OMNI/Rogers is a real capitalist company; all television and film in Canada gets government money in one way or other.)
Congratulations to all the liberal wimps who let him in, and encourage his blather about of “censorship” — on the same airwaves he wants to police. What a genius.
But wait, there’s more – from his website:
Among the writers he introduced into the business was author Naomi Klein.
PS: from the OMNI website …
The ethnic population in Toronto/Hamilton is growing rapidly, at about twice the rate of the population as a whole. By 2011, over 68% of the people living in the Toronto area will be of ethnic origin,” says Madeline Ziniak, Vice President and Station Manager of Multilingual Television, Rogers Television. “The launch of OMNI.2 on the analog dial will mean accessibility to more ethnic programming for more ethnocultural groups, in more languages, free, over-the air.”
And here’s one of them!
(KEEP READING...)
By Kathy Shaidle on Saturday, July 30th, 2011
No Comments
And calls for media censorship — so: you first, asshole!
This man represents everything that is wrong with Canada today.
And I’m obliged to help pay for his bullshit, through my extorted tax dollars. (Don’t tell me that OMNI/Rogers is a real capitalist company; all television and film in Canada gets government money in one way or other.)
Congratulations to all the liberal wimps who let him in, and encourage his blather about of “censorship” — on the same airwaves he wants to police. What a genius.
But wait, there’s more – from his website:
Among the writers he introduced into the business was author Naomi Klein.
PS: from the OMNI website …
The ethnic population in Toronto/Hamilton is growing rapidly, at about twice the rate of the population as a whole. By 2011, over 68% of the people living in the Toronto area will be of ethnic origin,” says Madeline Ziniak, Vice President and Station Manager of Multilingual Television, Rogers Television. “The launch of OMNI.2 on the analog dial will mean accessibility to more ethnic programming for more ethnocultural groups, in more languages, free, over-the air.”
And here’s one of them!
(KEEP READING...)
Wednesday, June 08, 2011
Getting Back To Reality
Ann Coulter on the ‘Liberal Mob’ of the American Left
Posted on June 8, 2011 by Jack
New York Times bestselling author and conservative political commentator Ann Coulter’s new book, “Demonic: How the Liberal Mob is Endangering America”, tackles politics once again, this time taking on the liberal left and what she describes as their “mob behavior.”
In “Demonic,” Coulter traces the words and movements of groups from the Ku Klux Klan and the SDS to anti-war protesters and Democrats today to argue her point that liberals have “consistently used mob tactics to implement their idea of the ‘general will.’”
“Just as fire seeks oxygen, Democrats seek power, which is why they will always be found championing the mob whether the mob consists of Democrats lynching blacks or Democrats slandering the critics of Obama Care as racists,” Coulter writes.
“Demonic” is the eighth book from Coulter, also a frequent television political commentator.
Read an excerpt from “Demonic” below, then check out some other books in the “GMA” library.
[More]
Posted on June 8, 2011 by Jack
New York Times bestselling author and conservative political commentator Ann Coulter’s new book, “Demonic: How the Liberal Mob is Endangering America”, tackles politics once again, this time taking on the liberal left and what she describes as their “mob behavior.”
In “Demonic,” Coulter traces the words and movements of groups from the Ku Klux Klan and the SDS to anti-war protesters and Democrats today to argue her point that liberals have “consistently used mob tactics to implement their idea of the ‘general will.’”
“Just as fire seeks oxygen, Democrats seek power, which is why they will always be found championing the mob whether the mob consists of Democrats lynching blacks or Democrats slandering the critics of Obama Care as racists,” Coulter writes.
“Demonic” is the eighth book from Coulter, also a frequent television political commentator.
Read an excerpt from “Demonic” below, then check out some other books in the “GMA” library.
[More]
Saturday, January 01, 2011
Charity Begins At Home...
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Coulter And TSA...
NAPOLITANO: THE BALL’S IN MY COURT NOW
by Ann Coulter
November 17, 2010
After the 9/11 attacks, when 19 Muslim terrorists -- 15 from Saudi Arabia, two from the United Arab Emirates and one each from Egypt and Lebanon, 14 with "al" in their names -- took over commercial aircraft with box-cutters, the government banned sharp objects from planes.
Airport security began confiscating little old ladies' knitting needles and breaking the mouse-sized nail files off of passengers' nail clippers. Surprisingly, no decrease in the number of hijacking attempts by little old ladies and manicurists was noted.
After another Muslim terrorist, Richard Reid, AKA Tariq Raja, AKA Abdel Rahim, AKA Abdul Raheem, AKA Abu Ibrahim, AKA Sammy Cohen (which was only his eHarmony alias), tried to blow up a commercial aircraft with explosive-laden sneakers, the government prohibited more than 3 ounces of liquid from being carried on airplanes.
All passengers were required to take off their shoes for special security screening, which did not thwart a single terrorist attack, but made airport security checkpoints a lot smellier.
After Muslim terrorist Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab of Nigeria tried to detonate explosive material in his underwear over Detroit last Christmas, the government began requiring nude body scans at airports.
The machines, which cannot detect chemicals or plastic, would not have caught the diaper bomber. So, again, no hijackers were stopped, but being able to see passengers in the nude boosted the morale of airport security personnel by 22 percent.
After explosives were inserted in two ink cartridges and placed on a plane headed to the United States from the Muslim nation of Yemen, the government banned printer cartridges from all domestic flights, resulting in no improvement in airport security, while requiring ink cartridges who traveled to take Amtrak.
So when the next Muslim terrorist, probably named Abdul Ahmed al Shehri, places explosives in his anal cavity, what is the government going to require then? (If you're looking for a good investment opportunity, might I suggest rubber gloves?)
Last year, a Muslim attempting to murder Prince Mohammed bin Nayef of Saudi Arabia blew himself up with a bomb stuck up his anus. Fortunately, this didn't happen near an airport, or Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano would now be requiring full body cavity searches to fly.
You can't stop a terrorist attack by searching for the explosives any more than you can stop crime by taking away everyone's guns.
In the 1970s, liberal ideas on crime swept the country. Gun owners were treated like criminals while actual criminals were coddled and released. If only we treated criminals with dignity and respect and showed them the system was fair, liberals told us, criminals would reward us with good behavior.
As is now well known, crime exploded in the '70s. It took decades of conservative law-and-order policies to get crime back to near-1950s levels.
It's similarly pointless to treat all Americans as if they're potential terrorists while trying to find and confiscate anything that could be used as a weapon. We can't search all passengers for explosives because Muslims stick explosives up their anuses. (Talk about jobs Americans just won't do.)
You have to search for the terrorists.
Fortunately, that's the one advantage we have in this war. In a lucky stroke, all the terrorists are swarthy, foreign-born, Muslim males. (Think: "Guys Madonna would date.")
This would give us a major leg up -- if only the country weren't insane.
Is there any question that we'd be looking for Swedes if the 9/11 terrorists, the shoe bomber, the diaper bomber and the printer cartridge bomber had all been Swedish? If the Irish Republican Army were bombing our planes, wouldn't we be looking for people with Irish surnames and an Irish appearance?
Only because the terrorists are Muslims do we pretend not to notice who keeps trying to blow up our planes.
It would be harder to find Swedes or Irish boarding commercial airliners in the U.S. than Muslims. Swarthy foreigners stand out like a sore thumb in an airport. The American domestic flying population is remarkably homogenous. An airport is not a Sears department store.
Only about a third of all Americans flew even once in the last year, and only 7 percent took more than four round trips. The majority of airline passengers are middle-aged, middle-class, white businessmen with about a million frequent flier miles. I'd wager that more than 90 percent of domestic air travelers were born in the U.S.
If the government did nothing more than have a five-minute conversation with the one passenger per flight born outside the U.S., you'd need 90 percent fewer Transportation Security Administration agents and airlines would be far safer than they are now.
Instead, Napolitano just keeps ordering more invasive searches of all passengers, without exception -- except members of Congress and government officials, who get VIP treatment, so they never know what she's doing to the rest of us.
Two weeks ago, Napolitano ordered TSA agents to start groping women's breasts and all passengers' genitalia -- children, nuns and rape victims, everyone except government officials and members of Congress. (Which is weird because Dennis Kucinich would like it.)
"Please have your genitalia out and ready to be fondled when you approach the security checkpoint."
This is the punishment for refusing the nude body scan for passengers who don't want to appear nude on live video or are worried about the skin cancer risk of the machines -- risks acknowledged by the very Johns Hopkins study touted by the government.
It is becoming increasingly obvious that we need to keep the government as far away from airport security as possible, and not only because Janet Napolitano did her graduate work in North Korea.
COPYRIGHT 2010 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL UCLICK
1130 Walnut, Kansas City, MO 64106
by Ann Coulter
November 17, 2010
After the 9/11 attacks, when 19 Muslim terrorists -- 15 from Saudi Arabia, two from the United Arab Emirates and one each from Egypt and Lebanon, 14 with "al" in their names -- took over commercial aircraft with box-cutters, the government banned sharp objects from planes.
Airport security began confiscating little old ladies' knitting needles and breaking the mouse-sized nail files off of passengers' nail clippers. Surprisingly, no decrease in the number of hijacking attempts by little old ladies and manicurists was noted.
After another Muslim terrorist, Richard Reid, AKA Tariq Raja, AKA Abdel Rahim, AKA Abdul Raheem, AKA Abu Ibrahim, AKA Sammy Cohen (which was only his eHarmony alias), tried to blow up a commercial aircraft with explosive-laden sneakers, the government prohibited more than 3 ounces of liquid from being carried on airplanes.
All passengers were required to take off their shoes for special security screening, which did not thwart a single terrorist attack, but made airport security checkpoints a lot smellier.
After Muslim terrorist Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab of Nigeria tried to detonate explosive material in his underwear over Detroit last Christmas, the government began requiring nude body scans at airports.
The machines, which cannot detect chemicals or plastic, would not have caught the diaper bomber. So, again, no hijackers were stopped, but being able to see passengers in the nude boosted the morale of airport security personnel by 22 percent.
After explosives were inserted in two ink cartridges and placed on a plane headed to the United States from the Muslim nation of Yemen, the government banned printer cartridges from all domestic flights, resulting in no improvement in airport security, while requiring ink cartridges who traveled to take Amtrak.
So when the next Muslim terrorist, probably named Abdul Ahmed al Shehri, places explosives in his anal cavity, what is the government going to require then? (If you're looking for a good investment opportunity, might I suggest rubber gloves?)
Last year, a Muslim attempting to murder Prince Mohammed bin Nayef of Saudi Arabia blew himself up with a bomb stuck up his anus. Fortunately, this didn't happen near an airport, or Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano would now be requiring full body cavity searches to fly.
You can't stop a terrorist attack by searching for the explosives any more than you can stop crime by taking away everyone's guns.
In the 1970s, liberal ideas on crime swept the country. Gun owners were treated like criminals while actual criminals were coddled and released. If only we treated criminals with dignity and respect and showed them the system was fair, liberals told us, criminals would reward us with good behavior.
As is now well known, crime exploded in the '70s. It took decades of conservative law-and-order policies to get crime back to near-1950s levels.
It's similarly pointless to treat all Americans as if they're potential terrorists while trying to find and confiscate anything that could be used as a weapon. We can't search all passengers for explosives because Muslims stick explosives up their anuses. (Talk about jobs Americans just won't do.)
You have to search for the terrorists.
Fortunately, that's the one advantage we have in this war. In a lucky stroke, all the terrorists are swarthy, foreign-born, Muslim males. (Think: "Guys Madonna would date.")
This would give us a major leg up -- if only the country weren't insane.
Is there any question that we'd be looking for Swedes if the 9/11 terrorists, the shoe bomber, the diaper bomber and the printer cartridge bomber had all been Swedish? If the Irish Republican Army were bombing our planes, wouldn't we be looking for people with Irish surnames and an Irish appearance?
Only because the terrorists are Muslims do we pretend not to notice who keeps trying to blow up our planes.
It would be harder to find Swedes or Irish boarding commercial airliners in the U.S. than Muslims. Swarthy foreigners stand out like a sore thumb in an airport. The American domestic flying population is remarkably homogenous. An airport is not a Sears department store.
Only about a third of all Americans flew even once in the last year, and only 7 percent took more than four round trips. The majority of airline passengers are middle-aged, middle-class, white businessmen with about a million frequent flier miles. I'd wager that more than 90 percent of domestic air travelers were born in the U.S.
If the government did nothing more than have a five-minute conversation with the one passenger per flight born outside the U.S., you'd need 90 percent fewer Transportation Security Administration agents and airlines would be far safer than they are now.
Instead, Napolitano just keeps ordering more invasive searches of all passengers, without exception -- except members of Congress and government officials, who get VIP treatment, so they never know what she's doing to the rest of us.
Two weeks ago, Napolitano ordered TSA agents to start groping women's breasts and all passengers' genitalia -- children, nuns and rape victims, everyone except government officials and members of Congress. (Which is weird because Dennis Kucinich would like it.)
"Please have your genitalia out and ready to be fondled when you approach the security checkpoint."
This is the punishment for refusing the nude body scan for passengers who don't want to appear nude on live video or are worried about the skin cancer risk of the machines -- risks acknowledged by the very Johns Hopkins study touted by the government.
It is becoming increasingly obvious that we need to keep the government as far away from airport security as possible, and not only because Janet Napolitano did her graduate work in North Korea.
COPYRIGHT 2010 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL UCLICK
1130 Walnut, Kansas City, MO 64106
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Thursday, July 01, 2010
Allan Rock...POMPOUS ASS!
... whether you love her or hate her or couldn't care less a live televised meeting would boost ratings. Don't hold your breathing waiting for Rock to initiate it!
Tasha Kheiriddin: Allan Rock pressed for gag on ‘foul-mouthed poltroon’ Ann Coulter
Tasha Kheiriddin June 30, 2010 – 10:20 am
Julie Oliver/Ottawa Citizen
Allan Rock
Canadian Press has obtained excerpts from an email exchange between Mr. Rock and Francois Houle, the university’s provost. They make clear that Mr. Rock was the guiding force behind Mr Houle’s now-infamous letter to Ms. Coulter warning her not to run afoul of Canada’s hate laws when she was invited to speak at the campus last March.
“Ann Coulter is a mean-spirited, small-minded, foul-mouthed poltroon,” Rock wrote to Houle in a March 18 email. “She is ‘the loud mouth that bespeaks the vacant mind’.”
Read More »
Labels:
Ann Coulter,
Annoyance,
Free Enterprise,
Free Speech
Friday, June 18, 2010
Can We Let Coulter Back Into Canada?
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
There Is No Question A Lot Of People Watch Him...
...and I used to but I found that eventually that while the names and places changed the incidents were the same.
March 30, 2010
But Glenn Beck Is The Crazy One
h/t
Related - CNN lost “almost half” of their viewers in the last year
Posted by Kate at 6:56 PM|
Labels:
Ann Coulter,
Glenn Beck,
Michelle Malkin
Sunday, March 28, 2010
Tht's All She Wrote...
Opinion: Whatever side you are on, Coulter won
Five Feet Of Fury
Universities are bastions of free speech? Not in Canada
The Coulter saga: Our universities can best be understood today as finishing schools in political correctness Mar 26, 2010Five Feet Of Fury
Friday, March 26, 2010
An Appropriate Gesture Of Apology...
...if she would accept it!
Facebook - An honourary degree for Ann Coulter from the University of Ottawa
Click here to become a fan of the facebook page An honourary degree for Ann Coulter from the University of Ottawa
Thursday, March 25, 2010
By Ann Coulter Rather Than About Ann coulter...
OH, CANADA!
by Ann Coulter
March 24, 2010
Since arriving in Canada I've been accused of thought crimes, threatened with criminal prosecution for speeches I hadn't yet given, and denounced on the floor of the Parliament (which was nice because that one was on my "bucket list").
Posters advertising my speech have been officially banned, while posters denouncing me are plastered all over the University of Ottawa campus. Elected officials have been prohibited from attending my speeches. Also, the local clothing stores are fresh out of brown shirts.
Welcome to Canada!
The provost of the University of Ottawa, average student IQ: 0, wrote to me -- widely disseminating his letter to at least a half-dozen intermediaries before it reached me -- in advance of my visit in order to recommend that I familiarize myself with Canada's criminal laws regarding hate speech.
This marks the first time I've ever gotten hate mail for something I might do in the future.
Apparently Canadian law forbids "promoting hatred against any identifiable group," which the provost, Francois A. Houle advised me, "would not only be considered inappropriate, but could in fact lead to criminal charges."
I was given no specific examples of what words and phrases I couldn't use, but I take it I'm not supposed to say, "F--- you, Francois."
While it was a relief to know that it is still permissible in Canada to promote hatred against unidentifiable groups, upon reading Francois' letter, I suddenly realized that I had just been the victim of a hate crime! And it was committed by Francois A. Houle (French for "Frank A. Hole").
What other speakers get a warning not to promote hatred? Did Francois A. Houle send a similarly worded letter to Israel-hater Omar Barghouti before he spoke last year at U of Ottawa? ("Ottawa": Indian for "Land of the Bed-Wetters.")
How about Angela Davis, Communist Party member and former Black Panther who spoke at the University of Zero just last month?
Or do only conservatives get letters admonishing them to be civil? Or -- my suspicion -- is it only conservative women who fuel Francois' rage?
How about sending a letter to all Muslim speakers advising them to please bathe once a week while in Canada? Would that constitute a hate crime?
I'm sure Canada's Human Rights Commission will get to the bottom of Francois' strange warning to me, inasmuch as I will be filing a complaint with that august body, so I expect they will be reviewing every letter the university has sent to other speakers prior to their speeches to see if any of them were threatened with criminal prosecution.
Both writer Mark Steyn and editor Ezra Levant have been investigated by the Human Rights Commission for promoting hatred toward Muslims.
Levant's alleged crime was to reprint the cartoons of Mohammed originally published in a Danish newspaper, leading practitioners of the Religion of Peace to engage in murderous violence across the globe. Steyn's alleged crime was to publish an excerpt of his book, "America Alone" in Maclean's magazine, in which he jauntily described Muslims as "hot for jihad."
Both of them also flew jet airliners full of passengers into skyscrapers in lower Manhattan, resulting in thousands of deaths. No, wait -- that was somebody else.
Curiously, however, there was no evidence that either the cartoons or the column did, in fact, incite hatred toward Muslims -- nor was there the remotest possibility that they would.
By contrast, conservative speakers are regularly subjected to violent attacks on college campuses. Bill Kristol, Pat Buchanan, David Horowitz and I have all been the targets of infamous campus attacks.
That's why the Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute (a sponsor of my Canada speeches) and the Young America's Foundation (a sponsor of many of my college speeches) don't send conservatives to college campuses without a bodyguard.
You'd have to be a real A-Houle not to anticipate that accusing a conservative of "promoting hatred" prior to her arrival on a college campus would in actuality -- not in liberal fantasies of terrified Muslims cowering in terror of Mark Steyn readers -- incite real-world violence toward the conservative.
The university itself acknowledged that Francois' letter was likely to provoke violence against me by demanding -- long after my speech was scheduled, but immediately after Francois disseminated his letter -- that my sponsors pony up more than $1,200 for extra security.
Also following Francois' letter, the Ottawa University Student Federation met for 7 1/2 hours to hammer out a series of resolutions denouncing me. The resolutions included:
"Whereas Ann Coulter is a hateful woman;
"Whereas she has made hateful comments against GLBTQ, Muslims, Jews and women;
"Whereas she violates an unwritten code of 'positive-space';
"Be it resolved that the SFUO express its disapproval of having Ann Coulter speak at the University of Ottawa."
At least the students didn't waste 7 1/2 hours on something silly, like their studies.
At the risk of violating anyone's positive space, what happened to Canada? How did the country that gave us Jim Carrey, Mike Myers, Martin Short, Dan Aykroyd and Catherine O'Hara suddenly become a bunch of whining crybabies?
Want to hear my favorite Canadian joke? OK, here goes: Francois Houle! I never get tired of that one.
After Tuesday night, the hatred incited by Francois' letter is no longer theoretical. The police called off my speech when the auditorium was surrounded by thousands of rioting liberals -- screaming, blocking the entrance, throwing tables, demanding that my books be burned, and finally setting off the fire alarm.
Sadly, I missed the book burning because I never made it to the building.
But, reportedly, a Canadian crowd hasn't been this excited since they opened a new Tim Hortons. Local reporters couldn't make out what the crowd was chanting, but it was something about "Molson" and a "sled dog."
I've given more than 100 college speeches, and not once has one of my speeches been shut down at any point. Even the pie-throwing incident at the University of Arizona didn't break up the event. I said "Get them!", the college Republicans got them, and then I continued with my rambling, hate-filled diatribe -- I mean, my speech.
So we've run this experiment more than 100 times.
Only one college speech was ever met with so much mob violence that the police were forced to cancel it: The one that was preceded by a letter from the university provost accusing me of hate speech.
(To add insult to injury, Francois didn't even plan to attend my speech because Tuesday is his bikini wax night.)
If a university official's letter accusing a speaker of having a proclivity to commit speech crimes before she's given the speech -- which then leads to Facebook postings demanding that Ann Coulter be hurt, a massive riot and a police-ordered cancellation of the speech -- is not hate speech, then there is no such thing as hate speech.
Either Francois goes to jail or the Human Rights Commission is a hoax and a fraud.
by Ann Coulter
March 24, 2010
Since arriving in Canada I've been accused of thought crimes, threatened with criminal prosecution for speeches I hadn't yet given, and denounced on the floor of the Parliament (which was nice because that one was on my "bucket list").
Posters advertising my speech have been officially banned, while posters denouncing me are plastered all over the University of Ottawa campus. Elected officials have been prohibited from attending my speeches. Also, the local clothing stores are fresh out of brown shirts.
Welcome to Canada!
The provost of the University of Ottawa, average student IQ: 0, wrote to me -- widely disseminating his letter to at least a half-dozen intermediaries before it reached me -- in advance of my visit in order to recommend that I familiarize myself with Canada's criminal laws regarding hate speech.
This marks the first time I've ever gotten hate mail for something I might do in the future.
Apparently Canadian law forbids "promoting hatred against any identifiable group," which the provost, Francois A. Houle advised me, "would not only be considered inappropriate, but could in fact lead to criminal charges."
I was given no specific examples of what words and phrases I couldn't use, but I take it I'm not supposed to say, "F--- you, Francois."
While it was a relief to know that it is still permissible in Canada to promote hatred against unidentifiable groups, upon reading Francois' letter, I suddenly realized that I had just been the victim of a hate crime! And it was committed by Francois A. Houle (French for "Frank A. Hole").
What other speakers get a warning not to promote hatred? Did Francois A. Houle send a similarly worded letter to Israel-hater Omar Barghouti before he spoke last year at U of Ottawa? ("Ottawa": Indian for "Land of the Bed-Wetters.")
How about Angela Davis, Communist Party member and former Black Panther who spoke at the University of Zero just last month?
Or do only conservatives get letters admonishing them to be civil? Or -- my suspicion -- is it only conservative women who fuel Francois' rage?
How about sending a letter to all Muslim speakers advising them to please bathe once a week while in Canada? Would that constitute a hate crime?
I'm sure Canada's Human Rights Commission will get to the bottom of Francois' strange warning to me, inasmuch as I will be filing a complaint with that august body, so I expect they will be reviewing every letter the university has sent to other speakers prior to their speeches to see if any of them were threatened with criminal prosecution.
Both writer Mark Steyn and editor Ezra Levant have been investigated by the Human Rights Commission for promoting hatred toward Muslims.
Levant's alleged crime was to reprint the cartoons of Mohammed originally published in a Danish newspaper, leading practitioners of the Religion of Peace to engage in murderous violence across the globe. Steyn's alleged crime was to publish an excerpt of his book, "America Alone" in Maclean's magazine, in which he jauntily described Muslims as "hot for jihad."
Both of them also flew jet airliners full of passengers into skyscrapers in lower Manhattan, resulting in thousands of deaths. No, wait -- that was somebody else.
Curiously, however, there was no evidence that either the cartoons or the column did, in fact, incite hatred toward Muslims -- nor was there the remotest possibility that they would.
By contrast, conservative speakers are regularly subjected to violent attacks on college campuses. Bill Kristol, Pat Buchanan, David Horowitz and I have all been the targets of infamous campus attacks.
That's why the Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute (a sponsor of my Canada speeches) and the Young America's Foundation (a sponsor of many of my college speeches) don't send conservatives to college campuses without a bodyguard.
You'd have to be a real A-Houle not to anticipate that accusing a conservative of "promoting hatred" prior to her arrival on a college campus would in actuality -- not in liberal fantasies of terrified Muslims cowering in terror of Mark Steyn readers -- incite real-world violence toward the conservative.
The university itself acknowledged that Francois' letter was likely to provoke violence against me by demanding -- long after my speech was scheduled, but immediately after Francois disseminated his letter -- that my sponsors pony up more than $1,200 for extra security.
Also following Francois' letter, the Ottawa University Student Federation met for 7 1/2 hours to hammer out a series of resolutions denouncing me. The resolutions included:
"Whereas Ann Coulter is a hateful woman;
"Whereas she has made hateful comments against GLBTQ, Muslims, Jews and women;
"Whereas she violates an unwritten code of 'positive-space';
"Be it resolved that the SFUO express its disapproval of having Ann Coulter speak at the University of Ottawa."
At least the students didn't waste 7 1/2 hours on something silly, like their studies.
At the risk of violating anyone's positive space, what happened to Canada? How did the country that gave us Jim Carrey, Mike Myers, Martin Short, Dan Aykroyd and Catherine O'Hara suddenly become a bunch of whining crybabies?
Want to hear my favorite Canadian joke? OK, here goes: Francois Houle! I never get tired of that one.
After Tuesday night, the hatred incited by Francois' letter is no longer theoretical. The police called off my speech when the auditorium was surrounded by thousands of rioting liberals -- screaming, blocking the entrance, throwing tables, demanding that my books be burned, and finally setting off the fire alarm.
Sadly, I missed the book burning because I never made it to the building.
But, reportedly, a Canadian crowd hasn't been this excited since they opened a new Tim Hortons. Local reporters couldn't make out what the crowd was chanting, but it was something about "Molson" and a "sled dog."
I've given more than 100 college speeches, and not once has one of my speeches been shut down at any point. Even the pie-throwing incident at the University of Arizona didn't break up the event. I said "Get them!", the college Republicans got them, and then I continued with my rambling, hate-filled diatribe -- I mean, my speech.
So we've run this experiment more than 100 times.
Only one college speech was ever met with so much mob violence that the police were forced to cancel it: The one that was preceded by a letter from the university provost accusing me of hate speech.
(To add insult to injury, Francois didn't even plan to attend my speech because Tuesday is his bikini wax night.)
If a university official's letter accusing a speaker of having a proclivity to commit speech crimes before she's given the speech -- which then leads to Facebook postings demanding that Ann Coulter be hurt, a massive riot and a police-ordered cancellation of the speech -- is not hate speech, then there is no such thing as hate speech.
Either Francois goes to jail or the Human Rights Commission is a hoax and a fraud.
How Many Protestors, From Wither Camp, Can Even Define Polemics
Ho Hum!
- Letters: At Ann Coulter event, 'lots of hate speech -- from students'
- Posted: March 25, 2010, 6:40 AM by Paul Russell Filed under: Letters
Ann Coulter continues to hold the attention of Canada. Here is some reaction from readers after her Ottawa speech was cancelled due to security concerns.
Re: Coulter Talk Cancelled For Security Reasons; Just Who's Guilty Of A Hate Crime, letters, both March 24. On Tuesday night I was one of several hundred people who waited patiently in the Ottawa rain to hear what Ann Coulter had to say, but alas it was not to be. It was an interesting experience being called a racist bigot and other slurs by a cadre of unruly and rude students, whose education is subsidized by my tax dollars. Then in yesterday's National Post, letter-writer Denise Cooke Browne asks the great unwashed not to "show up at [Ms. Coulter's] talks." Contempt prior to investigation: Doesn't that constitute bias? Ms. Cooke Browne also boasts of having been a former journalist and human rights investigator. It was fortunate I did not have to appear before her; I wouldn't have stood a chance. Geraldine Hyland, Orleans, Ont. While watching television coverage of Ann Coulter's aborted speech at the University of Ottawa on Tuesday, I saw no free speech but plenty of hate speech and threats of violence --from the students. Sharon Quickfall, Edmonton.Click here to read more...- Kevin Libin: 'Liberals know I haven’t said anything hateful,' Ann Coulter explains
- Posted: March 24, 2010, 8:28 PM by Daniel Kaszor Filed under: Full Comment,Kevin Libin,canada,protests,ann coulter,Freedom of Speech,U of O,U of C,Hate SpeechOne incontrovertible lesson to come from Ann Coulter's aborted speech in Ottawa Tuesday night, and indeed from the national reaction to her Canadian speaking tour this week, is that the U.S. pundit didn't even have to open her mouth to ignite a controversy about freedom of speech in Canada. Warned by campus authorities to censor herself or face the full brunt of Canada’s speech laws before she even arrived; subjected to fairly intense on-campus protests with students calling her hateful and demanding she not be allowed to speak; the talk was cancelled, citing security concerns. Ann Coulter had come to talk about political correctness and freedom of speech; about the double standard applied between conservatives and liberals. She made a most powerful statement without even showing up.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Hmm! Wonder Who Pulled The Fire Alarm?
Ann Coulter event cancelled over 'public safety' fears
A public-speaking event for U.S. right-wing pundit Ann Coulter was cancelled on Tuesday night after angry protesters arrived and a fire...- Kelly McParland: The suffering of Ann Coulter
- I'm the victim of a hate crime, Ann Coulter tells Canadian audience
GOTCHA!
174 persons commented to the following reports by CTV and I fail to see the difference between those individuals and Coulter ...they expressed their views (sound bites) which were reported by the media and could be taken out of contexts.
Bottom line though is many more people now know the name Ann Coulter ...
Coulter tells Ont. Muslim student to 'take a camel'
Coulter speech cancelled over fears of violence
Labels:
Ann Coulter,
Free Speech,
Freedom Of Expression
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
A "Sister" Jumps To Ann's Defense...
'Whereas Ann Coulter is a hateful woman...'
My new post at David Horowitz's NewsReal blog looks at the latest absurd development re: the "arrest Ann Coulter" campaign that's (not really) sweeping Canadian campuses.PS: angwy interlecktural stoodints spell "Ann" wong.
Anyhow: I'll be at the London, Ontario talk tonight.
Looks like Binks will be following this story while I'm in the car...
# Kathy Shaidle
Saturday, March 20, 2010
COULTER IN CANADA! Boundless Opportunities...
...for Ann to make a few bucks and for left social in-activists to get their 15 minutes in the spotlight.
Monday, March 22, 2010: University of Western Ontario, London
LOCATION: Ontario; North Campus Building - Room 101 (NCB101);
Doors open at 7:00 p.m.-7:30 p.m. Ann Coulter 8:15 p.m. - Q & A; + Book signing
To register in London Ontario, please contact: london@coulterincanada.com
Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010: University of Ottawa
LOCATION: 140 Louis Pasteur Building code: MRN
Doors open at 7:00 p.m-7:30 p.m. - Ann Coulter 8:15 p.m. - Q & A + Book signing
To register in Ottawa Ontario, please contact: ottawa@coulterincanada.com
Thursday, March 25th, 2010: University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
LOCATION: Main Campus, ST (Science Theatres), Room 140
Doors open at 7:00 p.m.-7:30 p.m. - Ann Coulter 8:15 p.m. - Q & A + Book signing
To register in Calgary Alberta, please contact: calgary@coulterincanada.com
Monday, March 22, 2010: University of Western Ontario, London
LOCATION: Ontario; North Campus Building - Room 101 (NCB101);
Doors open at 7:00 p.m.-7:30 p.m. Ann Coulter 8:15 p.m. - Q & A; + Book signing
To register in London Ontario, please contact: london@coulterincanada.com
Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010: University of Ottawa
LOCATION: 140 Louis Pasteur Building code: MRN
Doors open at 7:00 p.m-7:30 p.m. - Ann Coulter 8:15 p.m. - Q & A + Book signing
To register in Ottawa Ontario, please contact: ottawa@coulterincanada.com
Thursday, March 25th, 2010: University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
LOCATION: Main Campus, ST (Science Theatres), Room 140
Doors open at 7:00 p.m.-7:30 p.m. - Ann Coulter 8:15 p.m. - Q & A + Book signing
To register in Calgary Alberta, please contact: calgary@coulterincanada.com
Labels:
Ann Coulter,
Left Wing Losers,
Social In-activists
Thursday, May 07, 2009
Took Courage To Post.......
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
About Me
- Unhypentated Canadian
- I lean to the right but I still have a heart and if I have a mission it is to respond to attacks on people not available to protect themselves and to point out the hypocrisy of the left at every opportunity.MY MAJOR GOAL IS HIGHLIGHT THE HYPOCRISY AND STUPIDITY OF THE LEFTISTS ON TORONTO CITY COUNCIL. Last word: In the final analysis this blog is a relief valve for my rants/raves.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2014
(1131)
-
▼
August
(83)
- THATS WYNNER NIBBLING ON YOUR EAR...
- FORGET THE FACTS! WHITEY HAS TO BE GUILTY...
- FOR SHAME, FOR SHAME...
- OKAY CLASS...
- GOOD LUCK CHARLIE MILQUEST...
- LIKEN IT TO AN ITCHY CROTCH
- ULTIMATE OXYMORONIC...
- The "BIG GUY" DESERVES A FEW LAFFS...
- LET'S STAY ON HIS CASE...
- SNEAKING INTO THE LONGHOUSE NOT RESTRICTED TO "FIR...
- EVERYONE has own special one...
- R.I.P. DOESN'T BEGIN TO EXPRESS FEELINGS
- CNE/PAN AM DEBACLE?
- WHICH WILL YOU REMEMBER?
- NUT DOESN'T FALL FAR FROM TEAM...
- OBAMA RETURNING TO ROOTS???
- good morning gary...
- A QUICK PEEK INTO ANTI- GROUPS...
- GOOD TO SEE YOU BACK CHRISTIE...
- A MUST, MUST, MUST....READ
- DIVERSITY DIVERSITY DIVERSITY...
- ARE WE WINNERS IN OUR CHINA TRADE DEAL?
- WYNNER Tapping McGoonty VASELINE Reserve
- WYNNER'S NOT WHINING.
- BUT HE IS A GOOD "OL BOY...
- IT HAS BCOME A TRADITION!
- OH WELL...ENJOY!
- OOPS! SORRY THIS HAS NO CONNECTION TO TTC...
- TORSTAR HAVE FILED ADOPTION PAPERS FOR FORD BROS.
- THE CHAMPIONS OF THE MCGOONTY/WYNNER CLIQUE...
- NO LONGER
- IT IS "THE RESIDENTS" COMPLACENCY...
- WILL SUNMEDIA POST A COPY?
- VALID QUESTIONS AND YOU CAN ADD...
- MOTHER NATURE PISSED OFF...
- REALITY CATCHING UP TO US,,,
- SELF GOVERNMENT AT IT'S FINEST...
- NUT SEASON IS COMING...
- A Difficult Choice BUT
- Grt ALL The Facts Before Taking A Stand...
- G'Day Rex...
- PAT SAJAK DISEMINATES TRUTH/REALITY TROLLS
- WE KNEW THERE WAS A PUNGENT ODOUR AT SILLY HALL...
- WHO DOESN'T?
- Degree In Social Work...
- Who Are THEY???
- Who Are THEY?
- VACATING WASHING FOR FUN & PLEASURE...
- CLEAN OUT THE BASEMENT...
- PASS THE CUP AROUND YOUR LOCAL TIMMIES/STARBUSKS, ...
- WANDERING IN THE TORONTO WILDERNESS...
- SHAKE YOUR HEAD BUT GET OUT AND VOTE...
- GUESS WHO WILL BE FIRST UP AGAINST WALL...
- FRESHNESS OF REALITY BY...
- NO1 NO1 NO1...
- TODAY'S ICE CREME...
- TRULY CANADIAN (THANK GAWD...)
- NOT PARENTING...
- CURB LANE BANDITS...
- WHERE WERE "PROTESTERS:"
- IT COULD BE TOO LATE...
- THE LEFT KNOWS HOW TO MAKE SOMETHING OBTUSE AN ISSUE
- WYNER PERCEPTIONS
- THE LEFT IS STARTING TO GOOSE STEP IN TORONTO...
- TORONTO POLITICS...
- HO HUM!
- Where Is The Outrage...
- HAPPY SIMCOE DAY
- YOUR FUTURE......
- LET'S FACE REALITY...
- A SUCCESS STORY...
- OUTLIVED IT'S PURPOSE DECADES AGO...
- Let's NOT Forget The MEDIAS contribution...
- Do YOU Care...
- THE BANNERS ARE DIFFERENT...
- DOES ANYONE BUT THE MEDIA CARE?
- WHERE PART OF YOUR GAS TAX GOES...
- Logic NOT Part Of Toronto Motto
- WHO NEEDS AN ELECTION?
- NOT QUALIFIED FOR MACdONALDS???
- ...
- WILL SATISFY MANY VOTERS...
- Hmmm...
-
▼
August
(83)


