Showing posts with label Idiots. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Idiots. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Starting To Wind Down...

Kheiriddin: Today’s anarchists are just cowards (2)

June - 28 - 2010 Reporter: Jack 6 Responses
Anarchists. They think they are the coolest thing, tricked out in balaclavas, bandannas, punk style and black clothes. Reminds me of the garb we wore in college, except the bandannas weren’t a tear gas shield, but a hair accessory. We didn’t run riot in the streets, either, just skulked past our exasperated parents, who were [...]

More on the G20 Street Party

A band of black-masked, malicious, and potentially dangerous ne’er-do-wells did their radical best to get a racket going: torched a couple of police cars, did their petty “let’s smash the windows” trick, insulted the police, intimidated spectators, and tried to order the press around.
The world has seen this knob of losers and self-nominated “anarchists” before; they gave themselves the comic-book brand “Black Bloc” long ago, and they have been the noisome tail to the dog of every high order world meeting for well over a decade.




"conditions for detainees at 629 eastern ave are illegal, immoral and dangerous" 

deserter's haven

Sunday, May 31, 2009

I Have Voiced My Concerns About This Happening........

Special protection for pedophiles? Monday, June 01, 2009

When I wrote on May 24 "Will discrimination against pedophiles be outlawed next?", I was being satirical. I didn't know that reality has nearly beaten me to it. The report below is from May 13 and concerns a bill that is already through the Reps and is now with the Senate:
"The US Senate Judiciary committee is now considering the so-called Hate Crimes Prevention Act passed by the House April 29, under the sponsorship of Rep John Conyers (D-MI) and 120 other Representatives. Dubbed the ”Thought Crimes Prevention Act” by some House Republicans, HB1913 includes pedophilia as a protected sexual orientation.

Prior to approval by the whole House, a party-line 10-13 vote of Conyers’ House Judiciary Committee April 23 rejected a proposal by Republican Rep Steve King (R-IA) “to define the term `sexual orientation’ as used in the bill to explicitly exclude pedophilia.” Wisconsin Democrat Tammy Baldwin, an open lesbian, called the amendment, “unnecessary and inflammatory.”

When judges are required to interpret any Act resulting from passage of HB1913, they will refer to this vote and see that the intent of the lawmakers was to protect pedophiles. This could lead to federal felony prosecutions against anyone who acts to expel a pedophile from his neighborhood. Federal felony convictions require a minimum one year incarceration in a federal penitentiary.

Source

Many reports on conservative sites have interpreted this bill as prohibiting speech. But that is a stretch. It refers to violent assaults or physical attacks. The current text of the bill is here. The definitions it refers to are from H.R.3355 (Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) and can be found here. Earlier versions of the bill did explicitly include a statment that speech was not targeted but that has now gone. At the end of the bill there is simply a pointless assertion that the bill does not attack any constitutional protections (such as the 1st Amendment).

A point to note is that H.R.3355 ALREADY adds extra punishment for "hate" in crimes prosecuted in Federal jurisdictions. The new bill aims to extend that to all jurisdictions. Since H.R.3355 has not led to prosecutions of speech alone and since HB1913 uses the same definition of "hate crime" as H.R.3355, concerns about it affecting speech may be over-cautious.

It is clear, however, that under the new law, attacking a pedophile would attract a more severe sentence than attacking a normal heterosexual person. The law puts pedophiles into an especially protected class. How that is compatible with the 14th ("equal protection") amendment escapes me.

Sunday, July 20, 2008

Bonoski Says It All When It Comes To Kadhir....


.....and for some reasons I get this gut feeling that those weeping for Kadhir probably also shed tears for cowards and deserters seeking refugee status.

Waste no tears on Khadr
Media misinterprets Gitmo video
The drama-queen response in the media to the Omar Khadr videotape out of Guantanamo Bay in 2003 -- with editorial writers, bloggers, and letter writers variously calling his treatment a "travesty," "nauseating," "appalling," "inhumane" -- entirely misses the point as to why the boy terrorist likely broke down in tears while being interrogated by Canadian authorities.
Full Column

July 16, 2008

Giving airtime to sedition

Zaynab Khadr made an appearance on the John Oakley show this morning (audio here) and quite the piece of theatre it was. To Oakley's credit, he raked her over the coals pretty well but one has to ask why we keep granting airtime to seditious jihadists who use it to spread lies and propaganda, like...

Zaynab_khadr My father was a charity worker.

Our family are dedicated Canadians who value the rule of law.

We sympathize with the victims of 9/11.

Just a victimized minority. A hapless Canadian who spent 2/3 of her life living in places like Pakistan and Afghanistan, only returning to Canada when her terrorists brother needed free health care, for the wound he received murdering American soldiers in Pakistan...and presumably to cash in her welfare cheques.

For want of a life less ordinary...

Tuesday, July 08, 2008

Let's Ban Bans......

Ban Guns! Ban Pesticides! Ban cellphones! Ban driving! Ban commercial development! Ban smoking! Ban sex! And the list goes on and on and usually bans are initiated by those who are the least impacted by the ban.

The Ottawa Citizen's Dan Gardner argues that Ontario's environment minister, John Gerretsen, having been confronted with the lack of scientific evidence supporting the province's new pesticide ban, did what all anti-chemical activists do. He "switch[ed] to a different argument"—namely, that we don't know the cumulative effect of any one chemical interacting with other chemicals. This is largely true, says Gardner, but unfortunately, there are more than a million chemicals in the food supply alone, and "one-half of all substances tested have been found to produce cancer in high-dose animal tests." So if the minister is serious about his concerns—and surely a man in his position would have to be, right?—then he's got some serious work to do.

Friday, August 03, 2007

If I Can't Find CSI New York Reruns On Cable

I will have friends of mine in the US send me DVDs of the show just to piss off the Writers Guild of Canada. I will watch what I want and I don't care where it is made as long as it is of interest to me and has some level of entertainment value. I watch Corner Gas as many times as I can find it.....I don't watch Little Mosque On The Prairie.

CSI's not history, up until now
Will CRTC's removal of show from History TV mean return of tit-for-tat scheduling?
August 02, 2007

television columnist

CSI: New York may be a very good show, heck, it may even be a great show. But it has no place on Canada's History channel.

That's the ruling of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, which heard a complaint by Maureen Parker, executive director of the Writers Guild of Canada, that CSI: New York should not be running on History Television given the cable network's mandate from the CRTC. Alliance Atlantis has until Sept. 1 to remove the show.

It seems we're entering another period of tit-for-tat scheduling. Like the time CTV successfully got the CRTC to order CBC to remove Royal Canadian Air Farce from Newsworld. CTV argued successfully RCAF had nothing to do with the making and reporting of news.

Or the time CBC shot back that CTV's own NewsNet wasn't fulfilling its broadcast regulation of providing an hourly news wheel of Canadian and international events with the introduction of Mike Duffy's Ottawa reports.

When Elwy Yost started decades ago with his old movies show, Saturday Night at the Movies, he had to insert an hour of educational fodder between his two gloriously golden old flicks and carefully link them to the theme of the night. If he didn't, CBC bureaucrats who were assigned to watch squawked to the CRTC.

It was the presence of up to 18 hours of CSI: New York on History that prompted Parker's successful write-in campaign. In its defence, Alliance Atlantis said the back story of CSI: NY included a lead character whose wife died in 9/11 and the program makes continuing references to Ground Zero and terrorist threats.

Will the CRTC's negative ruling against History reopen the door to the days every network engaged its own board of "content police" to check rivals' schedules for programs clearly not approved by the CRTC?

Thumbing my Starweek, I see reruns of Holmes on Homes are on BBCCanada. Yipes! This is a Canadian show. Is Mike Holmes going haughty on us by adopting a posh Brit accent or what? Or is it merely BBCC borrowing some programs from sister network HGTV?

The Métis poet Gregory Scofield recently got the profile treatment on Bravo! in a pretty wonderful hour special, Singing Home the Bones. Loved it, but should I have placed an anonymous call to the CRTC wondering why it hadn't run on APTN, the Aboriginal Peoples TV Network?

Now I'm going to feel guilty every time I watch Alfred Hitchcock or Batman. On Book Television. Not that American channels haven't been getting away with this kind of entanglement for years. A&E, as the title suggests, was once a high arts channel with dancing getting a night of its own each week and another devoted to opera. The network ditched arts and entertainment years ago, just forgot to change its name.

And today? You can catch such current A&E series as Dallas SWAT, Dog the Bounty Hunter, Gene Simmons: Family Jewels and The Two Coreys.

Parker's ploy was a brilliant way of highlighting the lack of Canadian content on Canadian cable networks. Of course, the Writers Guild of Canada would like to have Canadian series as popular as CSI: New York that could be rerun 18 hours a week. Think of all the residuals Canadian talent could be making.

My advice to cable programmers: be careful in the next few months what you're actually running. Hey, you guys at the Outdoor Life Network, don't get careless and clumsily insert something girlie from Slice by mistake. And you folks at YTV, its okay to rerun Falcon Beach but not Falcon Crest.

Me, I'll continue to watch what I want to watch no matter the station. And so will most other Canadian viewers indifferent to bureaucratic teasing. I'll even sneak in some reruns of CSI: New York if I know what cable channel might pick them up next.

Fashion TV, Food TV? I'll keep on trying.

Monday, July 02, 2007

Everyone Knows The McGinty Govt. Lost Touch With Reality

During their 249 broken promises election campaign and nothing has changed.......

Ont. moves to make trucks speed limiters mandatory
Canadian Press

TORONTO — Transportation Minister Donna Cansfield says big rigs will soon be travelling slower along Ontario highways.
Cansfield says the Ontario government is making it mandatory for large commercial vehicles to use speed limiters.
She says speed limiters would cap the speed of transport trucks and other large vehicles at 105 km/h.
Cansfield says the reason for capping the speed five kilometres above most speed limits is to give truckers the opportunity to pass slower vehicles.
The government says speed limiters will help improve safety on the road and cut greenhouse gas emissions in the province.
Cansfield says the Ontario Trucking Association played a large role in pressuring the government to enforce mandatory speed limiters on Ontario highways.
Comment: It is not professional truckers that are causing the mayhem on our highways it is inexperienced drivers who are in over their head and so called experienced drivers who speed, tailgate, cut in and out of traffic, etc. all situations that cause people to make split second decisions.
Police work to nab racers as accident toll climbs
toronto.ctv.ca
The OPP are fighting to curb highway racing as the list of accidents connected with reckless driving continues to grow.
.......

About Me

My photo
I lean to the right but I still have a heart and if I have a mission it is to respond to attacks on people not available to protect themselves and to point out the hypocrisy of the left at every opportunity.MY MAJOR GOAL IS HIGHLIGHT THE HYPOCRISY AND STUPIDITY OF THE LEFTISTS ON TORONTO CITY COUNCIL. Last word: In the final analysis this blog is a relief valve for my rants/raves.

Blog Archive