To Help Identify The "Protestor"

Putting Thingsd In Perspective...

Humorous Truth

Lets give ADBUSTERS the MAO/STALIN/MARX AWARD for the most successful advertising campaign since the 1930s...promoting the Red Book Manifesto was a necessary part of their campaign because most the participants could not afford the jackboots, military gear, etc. of the group from which the tactics were purloined.

Posted by Robert at 12:42 PM
Comments (20)

Costs of the Occupiers; Plus: Friday showdown in NYC, Boston backlash, Austin arrests

By Michelle Malkin • October 13, 2011 11:14 PM

A Position You Won't See In The "occupy toronto" PARADE...

Not one of the "99 Percent"


As a follow-up to this & this, SDA commenter 'Bemused' posted a link to the following image. Absolutely brilliant!

Posted by Robert at 1:10 AM
Comments (24)

When Will Sid Ryan, John Clarke, Judy Rebick, Et Al...

...take responsibility for not vetting the "protestors" and weeding out the "anarchists?"Judy Rebick has admitted she knew the tactics that would be used to create mayhem and is critical of police for not taking appropriate action...THE BIG QUESTION IS WHY DIDN'T SHE TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION?

Hundreds rally and march to mark first anniversary of G20

Note To Those Investigating Police Involved In G20 Demos...

...if you wonder where the anarchists who were part of the group who caused most of the criminal acts here is a hint. BTW the other group that needs to be investigated is local OCRAP terrorists.

Anarchists or the left's shock troops

‘FREAKING SCARY’: ANARCHISTS HIT WASHINGTON STATE NEWSPAPER & HOME OF PHOTOGRAPHER

Posted by jerry at 10:00 AM 0 comments
Labels: Dissecting leftism

Protestors Anarchists Et Al Have Moved On...

...WHEN WILL WE? The electorate showed it is not a major issue by electing a majority Conservative government!

Proof Positive OCRAP Is Ineffective...

Activist Communiqué:

Reverse the cuts. Restore the Special Diet. Raise the rates. May 18, 2011

ByKrystalline Kraus

The Ontario Coalition Against Poverty has been spear-heading the ‘Raise the Rates Campaign’ since 2005, demanding a raise in welfare and disability rates to where people can live with dignity.

Everyone has Charter Rights EXCEPT...

Warmington: G20 riot should never have happened 27


By Joe Warmington ,Toronto Sun
 
...the poor slobs, you and I, who pay the freight and suffer the consequences and let's not let the organizers off the hook when it comes to taking responsibility. OCRAP and the OFL used the "protest" as a method of furthering their causes without any fear of reprecussions.

FMTA Has Become A Leftist Cottage Industry...

...and property owners, including landlords, are paying the freight.

Tenant gravy train: Levy


By SUE-ANN LEVY, Toronto Sun

For more than 10 years a tenant group — with strong ties to left-wing city bureaucrats — has seen its sole-source contract not only renewed, no questions asked, but its funding has more than quadrupled as well.

A Much Need Program HIGHJACKED...

...by John Clarke, OCRAP and social in-activists who counseled many that did not qualify to apply and for their short term gains those who need the program will probably suffer.

Don’t slash food assistance

August 22, 2010

In March, the province announced that it intended to replace a food supplement program for eligible welfare recipients because it was “not sustainable” and “not achieving the intended results.” Now, Ontario’s most needy are waiting to see what the new program will look like when it is introduced as early as next month.
But the government has yet to reach out with any formal consultations among advocacy groups — let alone with the poor who will be directly affected. That has fed fears that Queen’s Park is not interested in producing a better program, just a cheaper one.
Such a move would hurt some of Ontario’s most vulnerable — those who suffer the twin scourges of poverty and illness — without even succeeding in saving any money.
Ontario’s special diet allowance currently provides $10 to $250 a month to some 165,000 welfare and disability support recipients, enabling them to buy specialized foods to better manage medical conditions, such as multiple sclerosis and diabetes. Restricting their access to those extra funds by tightening the rules will only make them poorer and, consequently, sicker. All that does is transfer the costs, plus additional ones, from the welfare budget to the health-care budget.
Surely the government recognizes it is better to improve someone’s ability to manage their illness through proper diet than it is to sit back and wait for them to arrive in a hospital emergency room.
It is understandable that a government already running a substantial deficit would have concerns about a program whose costs have risen dramatically — from $6 million to $221 million since 2003.
But the underlying problem is not the design of program itself or the alleged fraud suggested by the provincial auditor last fall in a report the government seized on. It is need.
At $585 a month for a single person, the current welfare rate is clearly inadequate to keep a roof overhead and buy food — let alone nutritious food.
For it to do any good to anyone — including taxpayers — the new program must meet the needs of those it purports to serve: welfare and disability support recipients with medical conditions. It is difficult to see how that can be achieved without, the two ministers involved — health and social services — talking to them.

A Much Needed Program Hijacked...

...by John Clarke, OCRAP and social in-activists who counseled many that did not qualify to apply and for their short term gains those who need the program will probably suffer.

Don’t slash food assistance

August 22, 2010

In March, the province announced that it intended to replace a food supplement program for eligible welfare recipients because it was “not sustainable” and “not achieving the intended results.” Now, Ontario’s most needy are waiting to see what the new program will look like when it is introduced as early as next month.
But the government has yet to reach out with any formal consultations among advocacy groups — let alone with the poor who will be directly affected. That has fed fears that Queen’s Park is not interested in producing a better program, just a cheaper one.
Such a move would hurt some of Ontario’s most vulnerable — those who suffer the twin scourges of poverty and illness — without even succeeding in saving any money.
Ontario’s special diet allowance currently provides $10 to $250 a month to some 165,000 welfare and disability support recipients, enabling them to buy specialized foods to better manage medical conditions, such as multiple sclerosis and diabetes. Restricting their access to those extra funds by tightening the rules will only make them poorer and, consequently, sicker. All that does is transfer the costs, plus additional ones, from the welfare budget to the health-care budget.
Surely the government recognizes it is better to improve someone’s ability to manage their illness through proper diet than it is to sit back and wait for them to arrive in a hospital emergency room.
It is understandable that a government already running a substantial deficit would have concerns about a program whose costs have risen dramatically — from $6 million to $221 million since 2003.
But the underlying problem is not the design of program itself or the alleged fraud suggested by the provincial auditor last fall in a report the government seized on. It is need.
At $585 a month for a single person, the current welfare rate is clearly inadequate to keep a roof overhead and buy food — let alone nutritious food.
For it to do any good to anyone — including taxpayers — the new program must meet the needs of those it purports to serve: welfare and disability support recipients with medical conditions. It is difficult to see how that can be achieved without, the two ministers involved — health and social services — talking to them.

And let's not forget the promises of Dulltoon McGinty abolish the cuts to welfare that Harris was forced to implement thanks to the stellar performance of Rae and the NDP

As Torontonians And Ontarioians We Must Accept The SHAME...

...that we leave in your face protesting to wingnut groups like OCRAP!

Nine arrested at welfare protest

Police moved in on a small group of activists speaking against welfare cuts yesterday, arresting nine of them after they occupied a provincial Liberal party office. 22 July 05:08 

...I'M GUILTY!

An Area That Might Benefit From The Efforts Of G20 Social In-Activists...

.fix the problems in their own backyard before worrying about the rest of the world but if they feel the global problem takes precedence then go and live and work for and with these people. Not much is accomplished in Starbucks and the other chi-chi coffee houses in Toronto.

Murder latest fright for Magnolia

By ROB LAMBERTI and CHRIS DOUCETTE, Toronto Sun

Two men sit on the steps of a crumbling house on Magnolia Ave. Friday afternoon, drinking beer from oversized bottles.

As Usual The Left Wing Deals With Law Keepers Rather Than The Law Breakers...

Not just about police

Mon Jul 12 2010

The debate over the events of the G20 summit weekend has unfortunately been narrowed down to a single question: are you for the police or against them? This is distracting us from the broader issues involved.

Conspiracy theorists say G20 riots were an 'inside job'

 Saviors Of Your Freedom

The Truth Was Buried By The G20 Protest Organizers...

* failure to admit violence was a foregone conclusion.

* failure to openly condemn the violence.

* failure to have parade marshals control and intervene when "rioting" took place.

...and now these same people are calling for an inquiry so they can promote their causes which received little press because of the actions of a known group of homegrown terrorists.

One Brave Man! Thousands Of Cowards...

Who's that brave man?

He might very well have been one the bravest people in the whole upside down city.

...made up of supporters of OCRAP, OFL, various NGOs, etc. Happy Canada Day!

Add To The List...No Lineups At Queens Quay Pay Toilet...

...but that's not surprising when you consider the major crap is emanating from Toronto Silly Hall. 

Back to 'civilized' Toronto

By MIKE STROBEL, Toronto Sun

Welcome back to civilization, Masai Mike ­— to riots, burning cop cars, Miller, McGuinty, the HST, the DVP, the TTC, the Leafs, the Raps, the Jays, bike lanes .

Gee Whiz Michele How Come No Touching Profiles Of The Pros...

...who travel to a multitudes of protests and are reluctant and secretive about the sources of their funding. You have to wonder how the backgrounds of Henrik, Brad, Paul, Sandra, et al match those of suicide bombers in the middle east? And the OCRAP lackeys contend they have a right to march, confront police, disrupt traffic and trample on the rights of the other 99.07% of the Toronto citizenry.

G20 protesters — The good, the mad and the cuddly

By MICHELE MANDEL, Toronto Sun

Last Updated: June 25, 2010 6:48pm

She’s armed with swimmer’s goggles, earplugs and a lemon-soaked bandanna in the event of teargas.
Such is the G20 arsenal of Sandra Smith, a 57-year-old protest veteran who spent four days in jail the last time demonstrators and Toronto Police clashed at the infamous Queen’s Park riot 10 years ago.
“No, I’m not scared,” she shrugs on this hot sunny day in Allan Gardens. “I’ve already got myself beat up so I know what it’s about. I was beaten from head to toe and 2 1/2 years later, they dropped the charges against me.”
Anti-poverty activists, gay and women’s rights crusaders, social action warriors, anarchist rabble-rousers — a volatile cocktail of demonstrators gathers in the leafy park to begin their weekend-long demonstrations against the G20.
At the helm is John Clarke, the ever-incendiary leader of OCAP, who is obviously itching for a violent showdown.
But what about these other people?
Estranged from her family, Smith is a sweet, middle-aged woman who has been at the forefront of many a demonstration. She’s especially proud of taking over a Don Jail guardhouse in an unsuccessful bid to get it turned over to the homeless.
“We have to stand up,” she explains. “Why are children going to bed hungry? Why are people homeless? I want things to really change and I want the people to win.”
Well-meaning, she’s your mother earth kind of protester. “I don’t believe in government. I believe in people taking care of each other.”
One of the people she’s trying to take care of is Paul Smith — no relation — who is of the more frightening activist variety.
The 31-year-old part-time landscaper is feeling light-headed in the summer sun and gratefully takes her water bottle.
He’s wearing a white T-shirt that he’s emblazoned with the eye-catching slogan: F--- the G20. Stop New World Order 666.”
He also has a video camera so he can capture the mayhem he’s sure will ensue.
“I’m scared,” he concedes, as his eyes dart nervously at the hundreds of police officers who have encircled the crowd.
“I don’t want the police to treat us like they did (at the G20 summit) in Pittsburgh where riot police were throwing people on the ground. It was all over YouTube.”
Yet he’s determined to challenge the downtown security wall. And why? Because, he explains, G20 leaders are planning a single world government to control us and implant us with computer chips.
“It’s scary stuff and it’s true,” Smith insists.
On a more rational plain nearby, Brad Drake is handing out postcards about a youth group he runs to engage teens in labour issues.
The 43-year-old is a protest veteran, and a labour agitator who helped organize newspaper carriers years ago.
By day, he’s a produce clerk who must depend on the generosity of his parents because he can’t make enough to raise his daughter. “For a working person, that’s wrong,” Drake argues. “I should be able to make a living.”
So he harbours a simmering anger at being shut out of this city’s prosperity — a mestastasizing bitterness that he believes is shared by many demonstrators.
“More and more people are feeling desperate,” he warns. “Pushing it to the next level seems to be their only option. I don’t know how we’re going to avoid confrontation.”
Henrik Vierula knows how — by offering his free hugs.
On a rainbow blanket, the 22-year-old aspiring massage therapist is strumming his guitar and offering cherries and healing love to passersby.
“Rather than throwing themselves at a line of cops, they can just come and hug each other,” explains the Ottawa man, his head wrapped in a blue scarf.
“To protest aggression with aggression is futile in my opinion. I know some people coming here won’t be satisfied until they get their bruises; they’ve bought their gas masks and they won’t be happy unless they get to use them.
“But,” he says with a beatific smile, “I’m not looking for a fight.”

Read Mandel Wednesday through Saturday. michele.mandel@sunmedia.ca or 416-947-2231.

Social-Inactivists/Anarchists Would Give "Homeless" Squatter Status...

...and I have to wonder how well this would be accepted by the property owners, businesses and tenants, etc. "squatter's rights or adverse possession, the law, in some circumstances, allows a trespasser or squatter to acquire ownership of someone else's property."

 

G20 will give homeless the heave-ho

Security forces must keep the downtown core clear

By TOM GODFREY, Toronto Sun

Last Updated: May 20, 2010 9:15pm

Some homeless men and women will be moved out of downtown as part of a security crackdown by Toronto Police for the G20 summit next month, officers and protesters say. Read the full story

OCRAP Needs To Face Reality...

NOW Tube

VIDEO: OCAP Marches on McGuinty

By Paul Terefenko Posted on Apr 15, 2010 at 04:30 PM

 

Hundreds march from Allan Gardens to Bay St. provincial government offices to protest last month's Liberal budget that abolished Special Diet supplement for those on social assistance and to call on a raising of rates to welfare and those on ODSP.

More

...and to  quit blaming Harris. OCRAP's real enemies were Bob Rae who took us to the brink of bankruptcy when he was premier, the liberals and Martin who wiped out the national debt on the backs of the provinces by reducing transfer payments and electing McGinty a second time after his first term of broken promises and last but not least supporting a fractured ndp cabal.