Showing posts with label Middle East. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Middle East. Show all posts

Sunday, February 14, 2010

One Of The Few That Has Been There...

Ahmadinejad provokes western anger

To fete the 31st anniversary of the 1979 Iranian Revolution, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad gleefully announced his nation will enrich uranium to 20%.
David Frum: Don't start bombing Iran just yet
Posted: February 13, 2010, 11:00 AM by NP Editor
"Go ahead — hit me.” That’s what the Iranian regime is saying to the United States. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad claims his scientists have enriched a batch of uranium to 20% radioactivity, well past the level needed for electricity production, but closer to the 90% level required for warheads. He boasted that his country should now be considered a “nuclear state.” Nations bent on nuclear breakout do not usually issue progress reports. They move stealthily, until they are ready to detonate a finished weapon. That’s what India did in the 1970s, Pakistan in the 1990s, North Korea in the 2000s. By contrast, the Iran nuclear program issues press releases like a second-place political campaign. Why? Two possible answers:

Sunday, December 27, 2009

Margolis Right On The Money...AGAIN

Kudos for 'stuffy' Canada

Margolis: fter a brutal year around the globe, our fiscally cautious ways have finally paid off. Some things we learned in 2009: The global recession that began in America in 2008 was triggered by run amok speculation, failure of government.. MORE...

Friday, August 29, 2008

Monday, July 02, 2007

A More Informed View Of What Is Happening In Afghanistan

For those that don't have the time, or inclination, to scour western media to get a true picture of what is actually happening on the ground in Afghanistan Kate at Small Dead Animals provides links..........

Afganhistan, as seen through the eyes of Afghan media. A great list of bookmarkables and a lot more info than you'll ever see from Canadian media. A LOT more. A must visit for Taliban Jack and his supporters.

Thanks Kate.......

Sunday, June 24, 2007

The Truth Be Known

It is really sad that the following is believed by many people to be true but then these are the same people who believe that the ills of the world can be put at the feet of our ancestors and society as a whole.

Disclaimer: Coren is being facetious so take the time to read the complete column before you start quoting him at your local anarchist coffee shop.

Watch the fault line

By MICHAEL COREN

They drag families out of homes and force wives and children to watch as the men are murdered. They shoot a rival 40 times in the head until there is only mush and muck left. They bind innocent people hand and foot and throw them from the top of apartment buildings.

Whom to blame? Israel and the U.S.A. of course.

They raid the hospitals, caring nothing if the sick and dying are thrown to the floor and trampled. They always seem to go for the hospitals. In Lebanon militia members dragged wounded men, from the same sub-sect of Islam, from their sickbeds and killed them with knives and blades as they moaned for pity.

Whom to blame? Israel and the U.S.A. of course.

They round up their Palestinian brothers as helpless prisoners and then machine-gun them to death. They drag the body of a commander of another faction through the streets from the back of a car, laughing as they do so.

They firebomb and shoot bullets into a United Nations' school that is immensely sympathetic to their cause but is, they claim, teaching children Christianity. It is not. They round up enemies they claim to be informers when they are nothing of the kind. They kill them like animals while crowds of onlookers cheer.

Whom to blame? Israel and the U.S.A.

A mother of eight children who is pregnant with her ninth plans to be a suicide bomber and kill innocent Israelis -- Muslims and Christians as well as Jews. She is allowed to enter the country because Israel makes exceptions to its closed border on compassionate grounds and gives first class medical treatment to people sworn to destroy it. She is captured, but is unrepentant, as apparently indifferent to the fate of Israeli children as she is to her unborn baby.

Whom to blame? Israel and the U.S.A. of course.

When Israel leaves Gaza, the Palestinians are left businesses and industries. They immediately destroy them. Within days they have assembled mobile rocket launchers and are shelling Israeli border towns. They do this every day until Israel responds.

The rockets and launchers require time and money, both of which could be used to build houses and hospitals and schools. But no. They complain that western countries have cut off aid after they elected a government dedicated to murdering Jews and exterminating a member of the UN.

But when North America and Europe was giving billions of dollars, they still launched rockets and failed to use the money properly. And what of the billion dollars recently given by Iran, or the countless amounts of cash possessed by Saudi Arabia and the Arab world?

They refuse to deal with this because, yes, it is far easier to blame Israel and the U.S.A.

The world says so little. So few words compared to what was said when Israel defended itself against holy fascist murder gangs in Lebanon or Fatah child-killers in the West Bank. The world lied about the numbers or blindly accepted everything the notoriously dishonest Palestinian spokespeople had to say. The world called for boycotts and motions and condemnation.

Because it's so easy to blame Israel and the U.S.A. But finally good and fair people are turning. Enough of your lies, enough of your animalistic behaviour, enough of your cause. You, they are saying, and only you are to blame.

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Lest We Forget

According to the socialists, the Euro-whiners, apologizers for Islamo-fascism and other sordid self-important groups, the War on Muslim terror is a canard.

According to these deep thinking groups and most media pundits the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are baseless, premised on white-imperialism; oil; racism; and [pace Rose O’Donnell and John Hopkins Univ.] the scene of the mass-slaughter of some 600.000 innocent civilians who were pre-2003, living the idyllic wonderful, life of the Arab-Muslim peacenik flying kites, dancing and making goat cheese.

Monday, June 04, 2007

If You Are In Favor Of WWIII

Then just sit back and let this nutbar have his way. If the left think they have a platform to remove troops from Afganhistan that platform will get very shaky if Isreal is attacked and the west have to come to their aid.

Iran president sees "countdown" to Israel's end
Sun Jun 3, 2007 3:18PM EDT

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran's president said on Sunday the Lebanese and the Palestinians had pressed a "countdown button" to bring an end to Israel.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who triggered outrage in the West two years ago when he said Israel should be "wiped off the map", has often referred to the destruction of the Jewish state but says Iran is not a threat.

"With God's help, the countdown button for the destruction of the Zionist regime has been pushed by the hands of the children of Lebanon and Palestine," Ahmadinejad said in a speech.

"By God's will, we will witness the destruction of this regime in the near future," he said. He did not elaborate.

Iran often praises the Palestinians for what it says is their resistance against Israeli occupation. Tehran also described the war last summer between Hezbollah in Lebanon and Israel as a victory for the Iranian-backed group.

"If you make a mistake and create another war against the oppressed Lebanese nation, this time the angry ocean of the nations of the region will remove your rotten ... roots from the region," the president said in another speech on Sunday night.

Thursday, May 24, 2007

Joke's On You, Canada

It wasn't a poll.

It was an IQ test.

Charles Adler: Canadians are telling his firm that they think that it's a good idea to negotiate with Afghanistan's Taliban insurgents as a way to end the violence. this poll was conducted for CTV and the Globe&Mail and there was almost two to one support....

[...]

I know some people would object to the question, but let me ask the question anyways - does everyone know who the Taliban is? [...] Were any of the people participating in this poll told that the Taliban have been known to chop people's heads off?

Tim Wollstencroft, Strategic Counsel: That would be ..ah ah.. that would be provactive and would probably be viewed as a biased question.

CA: My guess is that it would be informative, you see my guess is that if Canadians knew that the Taliban engaged in this kind of thing, they would think they're not the kinds of people who you can negotiate with.

TW: ah ...that might be that these are tough guys, but in the end these people are going to have to be talked to or dealt with in a diplomatic manner.

CA: You're saying you the pollster have decided that's what ought to be done and then you ask the question, is that the point?

[...]


CA: Let me just ask you Tim, and forget the poll - what do you know about the Taliban?

TW:That's not my job, my job is to get ah an accurate measure about whether people think that Canada should negotiate with the Taliban, yes or no.

CA: But what do you say to someone who says, "you know what, been down there and I know what the Taliban is all about and the question is preposterous".

TW: Ah.. well it's not preposterous ...

Listen to the whole thing.

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

Get Out Your Canada Flag Patches

And put them on your coats because I doubt whether Hamas terrorists could tell the difference between an American and a Canadian. If you don't have a flag patch you might be safe if you pin your ndp or bloc membership card to your coat.

Top Hamas official: Kill all Americans
JPost.com Staff, THE JERUSALEM POST May. 1, 2007

Sheik Ahmad Bahr, acting Speaker of the Palestinian Legislative Council, declared during a Friday sermon at a Sudan mosque that America and Israel will be annihilated and called upon Allah to kill Jews and Americans "to the very Last One." Following are excerpts from the sermon that took place last month, courtesy of MEMRI.

Ahmad Bahr began: "'You will be victorious' on the face of this planet. You are the masters of the world on the face of this planet. Yes, [the Koran says that] 'you will be victorious,' but only 'if you are believers.' Allah willing, 'you will be victorious,' while America and Israel will be annihilated. I guarantee you that the power of belief and faith is greater than the power of America and Israel. They are cowards who are eager for life, while we are eager for death for the sake of Allah. That is why America's nose was rubbed in the mud in Iraq, in Afghanistan, in Somalia, and everywhere."

Bahr continued and said that America will be annihilated, while Islam will remain. The Muslims "'will be victorious, if you are believers.' Oh Muslims, I guarantee you that the power of Allah is greater than America, by whom many are blinded today. Some people are blinded by the power of America. We say to them that with the might of Allah, with the might of His Messenger, and with the power of Allah, we are stronger than America and Israel."

The Hamas spokesperson concluded with a prayer, saying: "Oh Allah, vanquish the Jews and their supporters. Oh Allah, count their numbers, and kill them all, down to the very last one. Oh Allah, show them a day of darkness. Oh Allah, who sent down His Book, the mover of the clouds, who defeated the enemies of the Prophet, defeat the Jews and the Americans, and bring us victory over them."

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

I Am Sorry Paul But What Is The Solution

Putting everything aside I think that the primary purpose of Bush sending troops to Iraq was to bring a semblance of stability to the middle east which was being threatened by Saddam and his goal of becoming the Field Marshall of all the armed forces in the middle east and his piece de resistance would have been an all out assault on Isreal and the start of a full scale WWIII. In retrospect if the UN has had any balls they would have taken out Saddam during Desert Storm.

There is no question that "stability" to many in the west means a constant supply of oil and no matter how you cut out many of the "get out of iraq" crowd would change their minds about Bush if they had to walk to the 7-11 or sweat in the summer or freeze in the winter.

Bottom line until King Goar and Courtyard Clown Suzuki accomplish their save the world song and dance we are stuck in the middle east.......

War in Iraq far from being over
By PAUL BERTON

It was a shameless publicity stunt. Four years ago today, U.S. President George W. Bush swept onto the deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln in a Navy S-3B Viking, jumped out of the cockpit and declared "mission accomplished" in Iraq.

Saddam's statue had been toppled in Baghdad, and the man himself was on the run. Military experts, government officials and media commentators declared victory in the cradle of civilization.

At that time, little more than 100 U.S. soldiers had died. Many observers still believed weapons of mass destruction existed in Iraq. Some Iraqis said now they "could start living." Despite popular belief, al-Qaida was not -- yet -- operating in Iraq.

Four years later, more than 3,000 U.S. soldiers are dead, and some 24,000 wounded. Bush administration claims that Iraq harboured weapons of mass destruction have been revealed as outright lies, swallowed unquestioningly by the media. The war costs U.S. taxpayers $200 million a day and $1 trillion so far.

And terrorism, in Iraq and around the world, is fueled like never before by propaganda and the impression Americans are occupiers not liberators, bullies not saviours.

The heroic work of U.S. soldiers in Iraq is rendered suspect by the abuse and torture at Abu Ghraib prison and elsewhere.

Iraq is a mess. Infrastructure is devastated. Death and injury are commonplace. Doctors have fled. Westerners cower behind barricades. Iraqis fear for their lives. Corruption is rampant. Sectarian violence is out of control. Terrorism flourishes. Democracy, if ever possible, is today a ridiculous notion.

Civil war is inevitable -- if not already tragically apparent.

And the "mission" whatever it may once have been, will never be "accomplished."

Most ominously, this conflict threatens to draw in the region, destabilizing the entire Middle East.

Democrats, despite insisting U.S. soldiers be brought home, should realize with the same mounting horror as everyone else there is but one sad reality: the U.S. cannot stay, and it cannot leave.

The Sept. 11 attackers have finally accomplished their mission.

Ignore what any expert says. There are no solutions, and only one age-old lesson: war is hell.

Saturday, April 28, 2007

Who Looks After The Rights Of Taliban Prisoners


Ignatieff: O'Connor 'should be fired' over detainees
Updated Fri. Apr. 27 2007 6:19 PM ET
CTV.ca News Staff

Deputy Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff has called for the resignation of Defence Minister Gordon O'Connor, over the alleged mismanagement of Taliban detainees.

French female hostage released by Taliban

The Taliban has freed a French female aid worker who has been held hostage in Afghanistan for more than three weeks. Her male colleague and several Afghans are still being held. ...more

Zero tolerance on torture


We have no interest in Canadian troops becoming accessories to Afghan torturers, risking their lives to capture Taliban fighters only to hand them over to inhuman jailers.
- National Post

Stop The War! A Taliban Has A Boo Boo


Earlier this week, an opposition motion in the House of Commons, to get Canadian troops out of Afghanistan in 2009, was defeated by a vote of 150-134. Jack Layton, and his cabal of socialists, voted with the Conservatives, because as he put it, was nothing more than a green light for an extension to the mission. The NDP wants the troops out immediately.

This could only make sense if Jack Layton thinks he will be Prime Minister by 2009. But rather then delving into Layton's deluded logic, the mainstream liberal media choose instead, to focus on prisoner abuse

- Terry Pearson

-The Story

Monday, April 23, 2007

Measuring The Success Of Diplomacy


Remember Tha Last Time A Democrat Dealt With Iran



Would the stats be different if punitive action had been taken when Iran held US embassy staff hostage sending a message that there are consequences to baiting a world power.

An Insight Into Islam

They Are Not All Fragging Moonbats

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

An Appropriate Headline

Thursday, April 19, 2007

Nancy Pelosi Chamberlain

I don't know if Nancy Pelosi ever attended Woodstock, but she acts as though she never quite got over that one "bad trip". Her eyes fluttering and she's always wearing some kind of weird smile. Maybe it is just a natural high. To me she is the modern feminist version of Neville Chamberlain. Her and her party are willing to concede Iraq to whomever, the same way that Chamberlain gave up Czechoslovakia to Hitler. So much for freedom. What country will be next? And then? And then... I guess it just isn't worth it when so much can be gained politically by retreating. After all there is no more Global War on Terror. The dems just declared it. Puff. Gone. Just sit down with Assad, place a daisy in the barrel of his AK, kiss his tookis. Problem solved.

Nancy took this oath: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

Does she care one iota about the Constitution? After all, it was written by dead white guys a long time ago. It appears that the job of most politicians today is to dissolve the United States of America as quickly as possible. We are the problem. Not China, Russia, Iran, Syria, or Islamists. Nancy, are you going sharia on us in the name of "peace"? You looked great in the Khimar. You'd look so much better with the standard black niqab, though.

Where are the feminists in NOW concerning Islamic women and children? Nowhere. That's because you are FOS. You got your power. You made out OK. How about the women in the Middle East? You say "that's their culture". You say that because you are FOS. If you really cared about women you'd be marching on embassies and the UN demanding women not be treated as property and submitted to female circumcisions.

My contempt for this generation of "liberals" is utterly immense. Freedom is an archaic term to them now.

Source

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Wellington, Nelson, Churchill Rolling Over In Their Graves

quack, quack
Written by E.J Salisbury
Wednesday, 04 April 2007

Iran is back kidnapping foreigners again. This time, like last time, it is not going to end well.

It is nearly thirty years since the Ayatollah Khomeini's shock troops invaded the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and kidnapped the U.S. diplomats serving there. The saga lasted months and ended with Jimmy Carter's humiliation as the American helicopters crashed in the Iranian desert. The Islamic Republic of Iran was seen for what it was - an outlaw regime, crazed with religious malice, happy to demand sovereign respect from the world but equally happy to disregard the basic international legal norm that protects the physical safety of diplomats. Nothing has changed since then.

In 2007 the British sailors were kidnapped in waters apparently claimed by Iran. A search of the International Court of Justice registry reveals no case filed by Iran to prove this claim. This is hardly unusual, although it wouldn't perhaps surprise you to see a brazen Iranian Government flouting international law one week and using the ICJ the next to make its case. But we're talking mania and internal struggles here, not calculation. The belligerent faction within the Iranian hierarchy is behind the kidnapping. They want a fight because they sense the weakness in their enemies.

The Iranians are well entrenched across the Middle East. They have an extensive network of sleeper agents in Oman, in the Gulf, and along the Suez Canal. They have been planning things and quietly taking action for a long time. The kidnapping of the Israeli soldier and the subsequent Hezbollah-Israel war of last year was a proxy fight designed to reveal Israel's capabilities and allow for some propaganda battles in the West. That British women were seen marching in London carrying placards saying " We're all Hezbollah now" is potent evidence of Iranian success.

This time, though, Iran has picked an especially weak target. Britain has rarely been in worse hands. Blair is finished, little more than a corpse swinging from a bough as his days in Ten Downing Street ebb away. Gordon Brown is an appalling successor - an inward, envious man with the charisma of a mollusc who is deeply unpopular with the electorate. Waiting in the wings of the Labor Party is a potential challenger, one David Miliband, a climate change obsessive whose contribution to modern British life is a plan for personal carbon accounts for every citizen ( and a corps of inspectors to enforce carbon allowances). In Tehran these two men must surely evoke laughter.

More

The Reality Of Afganhistan

Let's honor them and offer our sympathy to their families and not use their sacrifices to further your personal agendas. IMHO the following is an example of an individual furthering their agenda......

Let's take great care to remember our veterans. There is no one who deserves more respect than those who are willing to fight and die for something in which they strongly believe. But let's not allow ourselves to glorify their sacrifice to the point where we forget their ultimate goal: living in peace as a free people.
Vimy Ridge should serve as a reminder to tirelessly strive for peace, not as a recruitment campaign for war. Given their way, Prime Minister Stephen Harper and a North American military-industrial complex eager to establish a foothold in Canada would have us fall into the same cycle of war and regret that the United States has been living since World War II.
Remember Vimy Ridge, yes. But never forget who we are as Canadians or what we stand for as a peace-loving people.
David Kemker, Janetville, Ont.


A grim reminder of war

Let's not lose focus on mission
By LORRIE GOLDSTEIN

If Canadians are going to be derailed from our mission in Afghanistan by the loss of 51 soldiers and one diplomat, we should never have sent them there in the first place.

Honouring the dead and respecting the grief of their families and comrades is one thing. But using every death to argue the mission should be abandoned, as so many in Canada's chattering classes do, is obscene.

Yes, war is hell. Yes, talking is better than fighting. Yes, peacekeeping is honourable.

But sometimes talk fails. Sometimes, there's no peace to keep. Sometimes, a freedom-hating enemy must be defeated, if a freedom-loving nation like ours is to stand for anything meaningful in this world.

Nice talk won't stop the Taliban. Nice talk won't deter al-Qaida.

Nice talk won't prevent Afghanistan from falling back under the iron-fisted rule of dangerous religious fanatics who turned it into a training ground for terrorists, while forcing its civilian population to live under a reign of terror.

If opposing that, if trying to prevent that from happening again, isn't something Canada stands for, then we stand for nothing worthwhile.

And if we stand for nothing, if every soldier's death is enough to make us doubt why we fight, then let's bring our soldiers home from Kandahar, now.

Then we can become what too many Canadians want us to be -- an ineffective, self-righteous, boring, scold, forever lecturing from the sidelines at enemies who will laugh at us and ignore us because, having taken our measure, they've found us wanting.

That wasn't the defeatist attitude of the Canadians who fought at Vimy Ridge, or the Somme, or Ypres, or Passchendaele, or Ortona, or Hill 70, or Juno Beach, or Dieppe, or Normandy, or in Hong Kong, or at the Battle of the Scheldt, the Battle of Britain, the Battle of the Atlantic, or in the Italian campaign and Korea.

It's not the attitude of the 2,500 Canadians who have volunteered to serve us in Afghanistan today.

Each day, they risk their lives for us, asking only that we remain certain of why we sent them there in the first place. Surely, we owe them that.

Monday, April 09, 2007

The Guardian Probably Supported Chamberlain's Diplomatic Efforts Also

This had little to do with diplomacy. As it has been pointed out before it was a test of British resolve and a propaganda exercise by the Iranians. Iran 2 Britain 0

Iran crisis proves diplomacy works TheStar.com - opinion - Iran crisis proves diplomacy works
April 09, 2007

British officials were promised by their Iranian counterparts that there would be light at the end of the tunnel of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's speech. And there was. In a "gift to the British people" the president pardoned the 15 servicemen his forces had seized in Iraqi waters 13 days earlier.

It was a sophisticated piece of political theatre, in which the president turned what had become a diplomatic disaster for Iran into something of a personal victory.

Not only did Ahmadinejad seize ownership of the issue from his rival Ali Larijani, secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, but he also showed mercy in the face of British aggression. Cut to the loop of film which showed some of the servicemen personally thanking the president for his act of clemency and the whole drama has a happy ending.

Or does it? What are the lessons to be drawn from this episode and who profits from it?

In the short term, the Iranian regime can be shown to have reasserted its territorial rights and its sovereignty after a series of international humiliations, such as the arrest of five Iranians by the Americans in Irbil, the disappearance and presumed defection of a top general on a trip to Istanbul, and the mysterious death of a top Iranian nuclear scientist.

The incident could also teach the British navy to be not quite so relaxed about its personnel in waters where the international boundary changes according to the seasonal rise of the mud banks.

The larger issue is the effect of all this on the wider stage. A sword of Damocles heavier than anything Britain can fashion is hanging over Iran, and it is the conviction of hawks in Washington and the defence establishment in Israel that the only way Iran can be prevented from enriching uranium is to bomb it.

For the moment, U.S. policy is to exert maximum pressure on Tehran through economic sanctions. For more than 10 years Europe, including Britain, argued that the best way of tackling the Islamic regime was through a course of constructive engagement, culminating in a grand bargain, by which Iran would get trade and investment deals in return for surrendering its right to enrich uranium and receiving the material it needed for its civilian nuclear fuel cycle from abroad.

The grand bargain is still on the table, although perched on the edge. The neo-conservatives argue that if this is how a conventionally armed Iran behaves, how would a nuclear-capable Iran or its proxies act?

But surely the real lesson is that quiet diplomacy does work and that it can work in the future. It is easy in Washington to pour scorn on Nancy Pelosi's efforts to engage with the Syrian leadership. But the Democratic house speaker is right to break the ban on U.S. official contacts with Syria. There is no substitute for direct negotiation, especially with a revolutionary Islamic regime in Iran, for whom the popularly held grievance about past American and British interference in the gulf is as important as the issue in hand.

This is an edited version of an editorial that appeared Thursday in the Guardian, London.

About Me

My photo
I lean to the right but I still have a heart and if I have a mission it is to respond to attacks on people not available to protect themselves and to point out the hypocrisy of the left at every opportunity.MY MAJOR GOAL IS HIGHLIGHT THE HYPOCRISY AND STUPIDITY OF THE LEFTISTS ON TORONTO CITY COUNCIL. Last word: In the final analysis this blog is a relief valve for my rants/raves.

Blog Archive