
Standing at the podium at City Hall, Mayor David Miller whips out his BlackBerry, his fingers dance around the keypad, and he faces the crowd.
An Internet Fisherman who uses barbless hooks and this one dimensional world as a way of releasing the frustrations of daily life. This is my pond. You are welcome only if you are civil and contribute something to the ambiance. I reserve the right to ignore/publish/reject anon comments.
First came gourmet burgers, then gourmet french fries. Now fast food is going upscale once more, as hot dogs become the latest foodie delight
By LACY ATALICK, SUN MEDIA
A dominant force in the battle against gang crime has expressed disappointment over the low turnout at an anti-violence rally that took place over the weekend.
Longtime readers of this blog will be quite familiar with race-baiting Democrat Rep. Diane Watson of California.
She attacked Ward Connerly for marrying a white woman.
She bragged about Washington, D.C. being a “chocolate city.”
She polluted the Hurricane Katrina aftermath with race card-playing nonsense.
Thanks to KABC, there’s audio of Watson heaping praise on Castro, Guevara, and the Cuban health system at her town hall meeting last night — as well as injecting her usual racial poison into the health care debate. (For a reminder of what Cuban health care is really like, click here.)
JANE TABER
At first blush, these lightweight or “mini” notebooks lend themselves perfectly to student life.
map of over 200 Toronto neighbourhoods. |
By BRYN WEESE, SUN MEDIA
What do Toronto's 13 priority neighbourhoods have in common?
By BRYN WEESE, ANTONELLA ARTUSO AND JENNY YUEN, SUN MEDIA
Cash won't paper over all the problems in Toronto's 13 priority neighbourhoods.
By ANTONELLA ARTUSO, BRYN WEESE AND JENNY YUEN, SUN MEDIA
On any given day, the piercing shriek of police sirens echo through Toronto's neighbourhoods.
In some, it's background noise
Knife fights, robberies, gang violence, drug busts, gunfire, sexual assaults, even murder if not routine are common.
By BRYN WEESE, ANTONELLA ARTUSO AND JENNY YUEN, SUN MEDIA
Two men jumped out of a white minivan in the Driftwood Court townhouse complex last September and started shooting.
The original sad story: A portion of a $3-million “tourism stimulus” grant from Ottawa was used to partially finance a Bill Clinton speech at the Canadian National Exhibition in Toronto. The even sadder update: No one’s coming. All right, that’s an exaggeration. Some people are coming. The organizers have sold about 7,000 advance tickets for the event, and a handful others may be sold at the door to impulse buyers already visiting the Ex. (“Honey, it just occurred to me — you know what would make this funnel cake taste even better? A Bill Clinton speech.”) But the organizers originally expected to sell more like 25,000 tickets, and have now had to scramble to change the layout of the venue to make the anticipated small crowd look... well, less small.
And that would be perfectly fine if this were a completely private venture financed by anyone but government. But with the addition of the feds’ stimulus money, the speech becomes a huge billboard advertisement for why such “stimulus” is a joke (not in the “ha ha” sense, but rather in the complete waste sense).
As Canada's ambassador to the United States for the past three years, Michael Wilson mostly went about his business quietly.
He was not Frank McKenna, who loved to press the flesh during his time in D.C., enjoyed stirring things up with the Bush administration when he felt Canada was being done wrong, and rarely met a microphone he didn't like. And he certainly wasn't Allan Gotlieb, the party-throwing diplomat who raised Canada's profile in the U.S. capital by wooing lawmakers and lobbyists alike with grand soirees that made him and his wife, Sondra, regulars in the society pages of the Washington Post.
Instead Wilson has been a workmanlike envoy, never flashy and certainly not seeking to make headlines. For Canadian reporters based in Washington, it was sometimes hard to tell whether Wilson actually liked the job -- he just never seemed to relish the glad-handing and schmoozing inherent to the position. And there was a sense that the Canadian media, especially, was to be tolerated but not courted -- though suspicions were the approach came on orders from Ottawa.
Yard signs resort to name calling in early start to 2010 election campaign
By DON PEAT, SUN MEDIA
Residents unhappy with Mayor David Miller's reign are taking it to the streets with a not-so-subtle sign campaign. Updated: Fri Aug. 28 2009 2:09:30 PM
A prankster who left a fake menu on car windshields in High Park, a place where dog poisonings have occurred, professes himself annoyed with what he sees as an over-reaction.
Mel Glickman created a flyer for the Dog Liver Café, a fictitious restaurant that offered "authentic Asian canine cuisine" and more than "100 ways to wok a dog."
This outraged some real dog owners. They called the police.
"They have to do some explaining as well about why they are so paranoid," Glickman said of his critics. "And the police -- what's up with them? Why did they think a guy who secretly poisons dogs would go and do something like this?"
Glickman noted he put his real phone number on the fake menu, so it's not like he was trying to hide.
The menu wasn't intended to insult either Asian people or dog owners.
Glickman, a 68-year-old retired architect, said he's a dog-lover and has helped deliver litters of kittens.
"I have nothing against dogs, and in a way, as some people are outraged by my actions, I'm outraged as well. Because how anyone can take something as farcical and satirical and obvious and extreme as this and say 'this guy is a secret poisoner of dogs' is a real stretch."
He described himself as "very proud" of some of the wordsmithing in the flyer. For example:
The 'company' behind the restaurant was described as a "subsidiary of Dog FU'D Inc."
In June 2008, eight dogs were poisoned in High Park's off-leash area. Two died.
However, the person who left the antifreeze may have been targeting raccoons, not dogs.
Please Add Comments(11)
Fido from Dogtown
Where's there's smoke there's fire. He says he has nothing against dogs but he deliberately draws attention to himself with bad taste menus of dog meat. When the provinces started cutting funds to mental institutions there had to be consequences like this. Me thinks he doth protest too much! Sounds like a pending CSI show.
pinkster
WOW...this guy sais he's just a prankster? Fantastic. He's the poster boy for stupidity... the disease there's no cure for.
Seriously?
Yes, by the way, I am a dog owner...
Wow people.
I'm not a fan of this guys sense of humour, but Torontonians need to get a grip. If you felt half as much angst to help your homeless, you'd be doing a greater service.
Doggonit
I think this is stupidity at its finest, though not directed at the author but rather at all those who can not take a step back and laugh off something so simple. Why are people so damn uptight that they fail to see the humour? There is no harm being done; no crime committed...
I for one think the only problem here is that someone actually called the police one man's harmless joke!
Erin
It's a joke! Really! Why sweat it? I would have laughed had I found this on my car. Life is too short to get bent over such things. Find the humour in each day and your soul will be better off for it.
And yes, I am a dog owner! She's the sweetest yellow lab in the world but then, I am biased.
:o)
Homer J
I think it's pretty funny. I already know what Beagle tongue tastes like from all the lick's I get from my hound.....he forgot to mention German Sheppard's Pie in his menu....
Outraged in Ont
I believe that Mr. Glickman should be prosecuted for hate crimes. Clearly his "joke" was racist and aimed at Asian people. It feeds on the Urban Legend that Asian restaurants serve dog meat. This flyer could damage the reputation of any Asian restaurants in the area.
The Chairman
The Ku Klux Klan didn't exactly keep to themselves either. Keep to architechture and leave comedy to the professionals Mel. I support your freedom of speech but this went a little too far? Why Asians? Why not Muslims, or Jews or Blacks? I think you picked on a group that you felt wouldn't fight back. Too bad you're wrong.
Jay-TO
His attempt at humour really isn't. They guy himself says he made it to show how uptight Torontonians are so he never intended to be funny from the start. His intention was to be offensive. The guy himself is just an obnoxious a-hole. He himself said in interviews that he despises Tamils, hates Cupe members and then makes up a menu with chinese sounding meals made of dog. He is offensive. You can tell he's obviously one of those new conservative types. Just a jerk. A rich overly entitled conservative jerk. His time would be better spent away from real humans. I hope he gets charged with mischief or worse just so he gets a criminal record.
Rob from NB
Perhaps Mel has a little too much time on his hands, but this is a satire with a slightly (or more) twisted sense of humour.
Therefore, it's a joke; people need to get over it.
Do you suffer from this malady that is the worst form of terrorism?
Take this simple test. Consult your local Reeducation Camp Supervisor to discuss results. And don't worry. There is a cure. You, too, can learn to love Big Brother.
"Are You An Islamophobe?," by Phyllis Chesler in Pajamas Media, August 26:
Are you an Islamophobe? Here is a simple test.Posted by Robert at 2:37 AMLorna Saltzman’s Test
Do you favor equal rights and treatment of women and men?
Do you oppose stoning of women accused of adultery?
Do you favor mandatory education of girls everywhere?
Do you oppose slavery and child prostitution?
Do you support complete freedom of expression and the press?
Do you support the right of an individual to worship in her chosen religion?
Do you oppose government- and mosque-supported anti-Semitic publications, radio, TV and textbooks?
Do you oppose the wearing of burqas in public places, schools and courts?
Do you oppose segregation of the sexes in public places and houses of worship?
Do you oppose the death penalty for non-Muslims and Muslims who convert to another religion?
Do you oppose “honor” killings?
Do you oppose female genital mutilation?
Do you oppose forced sexual relations?
Do you oppose discrimination against homosexuals?
Do you support the right to criticize religion?
Do you oppose polygamy?
Do you oppose child marriage, forced or otherwise?
Do you oppose the quranic mandate to kill non-Muslims and apostates?
Do you oppose the addition of sharia courts to your country’s legal system?
Do you disagree with the quran which asserts the superiority of Islam to all other religions?
If you answered most or all of these affirmatively, you are a vile Islamophobe and deserve to be beheaded as the quran instructs.
If you answered one third or more of them affirmatively, you are a borderline Islamophobe and need to receive brainwashing to become a full-fledged dhimmi.
If you answered a quarter or fewer affirmatively, you need a few private lessons in dhimmitude to scrub yourself clean of those remnants of Islamophobia.
If you answered affirmatively to NONE of these, Congratulations! You are a worthy observant (radical–PC addition) Muslim and have a bright future vilifying Jews, torturing women or, inshallah, becoming a suicide bomber.”
Thank you Lorna for laying it all out.
FYI: Lorna Saltzman has been a environmental writer, lecturer and organizer since the early 1970s and was a candidate for the US Green Party’s presidential nomination in 2004. Her articles on evolution, energy, Green politics and secularism can be found on her website:
www.lornasalzman.com
Treatment you'd only wish on Jack Layton;
We waited nearly an hour for a resident to finally stop by and enquire what the matter was. Appallingly, she had no prior knowledge of why my Mother had been admitted. My shock increased after she asked, in all seriousness, if the angioplasty had been a success. I can only assume that the look on my face caused her to retreat and summon the physician on duty. Exhibiting Solomon like wisdom, the attending doctor suggested that a physical examination was in order. She then disappeared with the resident in tow. A nurse was dispatched who informed us that my Mother would have to be undressed for the examination. Since this Angel of Mercy made no offer to assist, I took it upon myself to undress my bedridden mother in a public corridor, in full view of the passing parade of visitors, patients and staff. (Truth be told, the homeless guy was pretty discrete, or at least preoccupied.)
Mom was eventually examined, in the public corridor, and an ultrasound ordered, all while a street person dumped a filled adult diaper on the floor and replaced her own soiled bed linens in the ward next to us.
Read the whole thing.
Posted by KateThe garbage is being removed from the streets, but with an election pending, there’s more crap than usual going around City Hall ...more
Despite what I have written or said in the past, I firmly believe Stephen Harper is the greatest, most magnificent, most brilliant Prime Minister in the history of the universe.
And I look forward to one day serving the Great Leader with unthinking, blind obedience and with complete loyalty.
(There, if that doesn't get me a Senate appointment, I don't know what will.)
There are strange rumblings out of Toronto city hall. Toronto's most left-leaning politicians have approved a lawsuit against a newspaper, and surprisingly, it's not against us here at the Post. The city's general manager of solid waste took exception to a recent Toronto Star story claiming solid waste collection was suffering from serious flaws. The city is funding his suit.
Setting aside the oddity of Toronto's politicians suing their cheerleaders at the Star, there are serious issues at play here. Despite having recently voted down a proposal that would have let city councillors sue citizens on the taxpayers' dime, it is still permissible for the city to fund lawsuits approved by various officials at city hall. What could be more chilling to free speech than a thin-skinned politician or bureaucrat with a taxpayer-financed legal team? Remember, folks – even asking reasonable, fair, and completely valid questions might bankrupt you, if you can't afford to pay for your defence.
Nicole Lace wants to be the one in charge of how much the rest of the world knows about her life.
Putting a price tag on cyber-bullying
This week, Premier Dalton McGuinty summoned his Liberal caucus in from their summer frolics to attend a daylong meeting on, among other things, how to market his proposed harmonized sales tax.
Oddly, though Queen's Park is a summertime ghost town, its corridors an echoing emptiness, McGuinty did not hold this meeting in the government caucus room so generously provided in the Legislature building by taxpayers.
Nor did he find adequate to his tastes any of the many other rooms vacant around government precincts, which if not quite up to the Palace of Versailles are at least the equal of most hotel conference centres on the airport strip.
Instead, the caucus meeting was convened at the Toronto Board of Trade down on Bay St.
In the real-estate biz, the holy trinity is said to be location, location, location. In the image-obsessed political racket, it's symbolism, symbolism, symbolism.
So just what did the premier's choice of setting say?
First, for an initiative frequently billed as "bold," this was hardly a courageous expedition. The harmonized tax has long been a fond cause of the business community. It's doubtful that Liberals arriving in the heartland of HST support had a single chance encounter with a mind that needed changing.
How much bolder would it have been, say, to have met in the conference room of a suburban hockey complex, or the party room of a seniors' residence – the better to show a willingness to make the case for the new tax to folks who seem to have the deepest misgivings about it.
But there was a higher imperative at play. The McGuinty brain trust wants to demonstrate its pro-business bona fides. It also appears to be a little twitchy at the skittishness over the tax among government MPPs.
It was probably to keep potential caucus grumblers a little farther from meddlesome reporters that the meeting was held off site, and that the diversionary tactic of a premier's event was scheduled uptown at about the same time MPPs were arriving downtown.
Whatever the goal, it was apparently worth paying for. As the Star's Robert Benzie learned yesterday, the Liberal caucus paid $3,500 for the privilege of using the Bay St. space.
Which brings us back to the Choco-Bites.
That dubious $3.99 confection that one eHealth Ontario consultant already billing the province for $2,700 a day saw fit to also expense to taxpayers. The junk food that became shorthand for the spending fiasco for which the premier came to take ultimate responsibility.
What McGuinty said when new rules were announced for contracting and expense procedures was that "common sense" was called for in these matters. In fact, he set a new gold standard for appraising expenditures.
"If you couldn't sit down in front of a family at the breakfast table and say, `I'm submitting the bill for this or for that,' and look them straight in the eye then maybe you shouldn't be submitting that bill."
As it happens, the $3,500 bill to rent the Board of Trade space while government meeting rooms were vacant could have covered a lot.
It would cover about 350 hours' pay at minimum wage. It would cover the proposed HST rebate to several Ontario families.
It could even have covered the daily fees of an eHealth Ontario consultant, or about 14 per cent of a speech by the agency's former CEO, or a Willy Wonka-worthy mountain of Choco Bites.
But one thing's clear. Odds are the premier didn't vet the room rental past any Ontario breakfast table.
By SUN MEDIA
Toronto A La Cart has quickly simmered down to Toronto a la flop.
By BRETT CLARKSON, SUN MEDIA
Gene Simmons isn't about to KISS and make up with the media.
Standing at the podium at City Hall, Mayor David Miller whips out his BlackBerry, his fingers dance around the keypad, and he faces the crowd.
For Toronto to become a wired city, it needs to become unwired.
Expert panel on infertility and adoption finds OHIP covering some IVF for women under the age of 42 may end up saving millions; single cycle can cost ...
If asked, people might say something along the lines of this Toronto Star editorial:
The rolls of the unemployed in Canada continue to grow... Many or most of them won't be eligible for employment insurance (EI), due to the program's Byzantine eligibility requirements.
Very alarming - especially that word "most". But how do we know that a large fraction - let alone "most" - of the newly-unemployed are in fact not eligible for EI? Isn't that something we'd like to know?
I know it's something I'd like to know, so I decided to do some digging. It turns out that the EI system is holding up pretty well - in fact, much better than one might have expected.
Our new ban on plastic bags has caused minor inconvenience for people who have long taken free grocery bags for granted. But a rise in spurious shoplifting accusations is an unintended side effect of this city bylaw.
A plastic bag serves as a marker of payment; anyone who has shopped at a major record store knows a sealed or stapled plastic bag was until recently the only ticket to leaving the premises without drawing the unwelcome attention of security. The 5-cent surcharge for a plastic bag means that wandering in and out of stores with a handful of goods is increasingly the norm, a situation that can lead to more than a few confrontations based on misunderstanding.
A slump in the economy may understandably put shop owners on the defensive in anticipating theft, but the plastic bag ban has made it much more difficult to pick out a shoplifter from an environmentally concerned shopper or, for that matter, a frugal one. Since the bag ban, I have witnessed an increasing number of incidents at stores where staff have confronted people leaving with a carton of milk or even walking by the storefront with a pint of strawberries. I have been challenged for the price of bread purchased at a nearby store and safely tucked away in my own canvas bag.
Shaming the shoplifter is one thing, but shaming the innocent customer is another. While stores have been relying on the plastic bag as a de facto proof of purchase, not to mention as mobile advertising, the bag ban requires shop owners to think of a new way of separating patron from perpetrator.
For the customer, becoming more diligent about saving receipts is one strategy, although at many stores these are not itemized and offer little proof of anything. Stickers are another option, where every item purchased is duly marked at the cash register. And not everyone seems to run into this problem – from what I've seen, merchants could save on stickers by offering them only to young people, who are, as usual, the most frequent victims of unwarranted suspicion.
And then there's the issue of trust. Vigilance is understandable, and the cloth bag does offer a ready-made alibi to wily shoplifters. However, if plastic bags are slowly being phased out, it means there needs to be a change in thinking about security. Catching a glimpse of someone with a peach in her purse doesn't imply the surreptitious activity it used to.
On the one hand, this might require that shoppers be watched more carefully from entrance to exit, their possessions searched and backpacks retained upon entry – a total surveillance scenario that seems nearly as unpleasant as a future of degraded ecosystems. On the other hand, can we ask for a little less suspicion and more benefit of the doubt?
Protecting the environment is not just about saving the rainforest or freeing the whales, it's about making Toronto a place that produces a little less waste. For their part, merchants must learn to scale back too – on accusations of shoplifting they have been making of late against customers who are trying to do their bit for the environment.
Stores that have long benefited from the free advertising emblazoned on their plastic bags would do well to consider how much more they will lose at the till from chasing consumers away, compared to their losses from shoplifting. They may well have to get more creative in policing their customers, but it's hard to believe that the plastic bag ban has made thieves more daring, or that the canvas bag has turned legions of shoppers into shoplifters.
Joceline Andersen is completing her master's degree in cinema studies at the University of Toronto.