...there is more wrong in the world than just WalMart! To the Ramparts, to the Ramparts.
Liberia debates logging its tropical timber
"Blood timber" used to fund violent rebels but new government hopes to launch responsible logging.
An Internet Fisherman who uses barbless hooks and this one dimensional world as a way of releasing the frustrations of daily life. This is my pond. You are welcome only if you are civil and contribute something to the ambiance. I reserve the right to ignore/publish/reject anon comments.
"Blood timber" used to fund violent rebels but new government hopes to launch responsible logging.
Although truth be told, I’d call in the military if I couldn’t get a Timmy’s I’d lined up for:
A man from Lower Sackville, N.S., says he will take Tim Hortons to the Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission because he can no longer get his coffee.
Dave Matthews needs a motorized scooter to get around because of a physical disability.
He used to get his coffee at the Tim Hortons drive-thru in Lower Sackville. But at a new location, in Bedford, he ran into trouble.
The attendant wouldn’t serve him because of a company policy banning pedestrians, bicycles, and wheelchairs, including motorized scooters, from using the drive-thru. Matthews says that means no coffee for him, because he can’t manoeuvre his scooter through the front door.
An inconvenience? A public complaint to a corporation? Worthy of calling the city for required access bylaws?
Yes, yes and yes.
A “human rights” complaint? Only in Canada.
National Post
By SUE-ANN LEVY
One might be prone to accuse socialist Councillor Paula Fletcher of regularly skating on thin ice when it concerns some of her wacky attempts to police pets, parks and the air we breathe.
But who'd figure the former Manitoba Communist party candidate and part-time vocalist would discover ice and skating to be her undoing.
Last Friday, while kicking off the outdoor skating season -- along with Mayor David Miller and her union sister councillor Janet Davis -- Fletcher took one kick too many, landing on her can and breaking her right wrist in three spots.
Yesterday, the good green member of Miller's team was sporting a fresh white cast -- already decorated with a few messages in green and a orange splotch of chili -- as well as fingers that were a decided black and blue.
Fletcher told me the cast, which adorns her writing arm, will need to be on for eight weeks. But knowing the councillor as I do, rest assured that this will not put her dogged efforts to police the world on ice. No, not one bit.
Sweden's sex law tough on johnsGOTEBORG, Sweden
If the Swedes didn't exactly invent sex, they certainly act as if they perfected it.
This land of the blond and the bland is largely credited with launching the sexual revolution of the '60s with their liberal attitudes toward loving and lusting. Groundbreaking blue cinema, erotic literature and live sex shows in Stockholm stoked a "Swedish Sin" culture of permissiveness teetering – to the morally outraged – on promiscuous.
But nearly a half-century on, there are precious few prostitutes left in the country. That's what the police claim, anyway, though reliable statistics are hard to come by.
Somewhere along the line, Swedes apparently got to feeling a bit abashed about their society's carnal excess. This is still, after all, a country that has long appointed itself as "moral guardian" to the world, superior about its political neutrality and inventor of cradle-to-grave state welfare.
It is also vigorously gender-neutral, with alliances in government – and ideology – between the family-values right and feminist-grim left. Thus was born the view, accepted now by all parties, that prostitutes are always victims of a societal order that makes women subordinate to men.
This sounds nearly like Andrea Dworkin cant – a radical concept, heavy on the lesbian tilt, whereby intercourse is always and innately invasive to the female, intrinsically unequal.
Sweden hasn't gone quite that far, as the sexual pendulum swings back. They remain, as far as a visitor can tell, hardy and unrestrained in their attitudes toward delights of the human body, while progressive and non-judgmental about most personal choices, 50 per cent of children born outside marriage, gays allowed to adopt.
But you can't buy a sex-trade worker anymore, as even a Supreme Court judge found out a couple of years ago, when he was charged with purchasing the services of a male prostitute.
SAN DIEGO (AP) -- A Superior Court judge on Thursday ordered Starbucks to pay its California baristas more than $100 million in back tips and interest that the coffee chain paid to shift supervisors.
San Diego Superior Court Judge Patricia Cowett also issued an injunction that prevents Starbucks' shift supervisors from sharing in future tips, saying state law prohibits managers and supervisors from sharing in employee gratuities.
Starbucks spokeswoman Valerie O'Neil said the company planned an immediate appeal of the ruling, calling it "fundamentally unfair and beyond all common sense and reason."
The lawsuit was filed in October 2004 by Jou Chou, a former Starbucks barista in La Jolla, who complained shift supervisors were sharing in employee tips.
The lawsuit gained ground in 2006 when it was granted class-action status, allowing the suit to go forward for as many as 100,000 former and current baristas in the coffee chain's California stores.
It was not immediately clear how many current and former employees are affected by the ruling.
"I feel vindicated," Chou said in a written statement released by attorneys. "Tips really help those receiving the lowest wages. I think Starbucks should pay shift supervisors higher wages instead of taking money from the tip pool."
Re:Harper files lawsuit against Liberals
over website claim
March 14
As far as our Prime Minister suing the Opposition party for libel goes, give me a break. It is nice that the party is taking on the cost of the litigation, but in the big scheme of things we are taking a massive step backward in democracy.
The whole purpose of an opposition party in a democracy is to question the government over issues. It would have been completely irresponsible for the Opposition party to ignore the Cadman issue and leave it outside the confines of the House of Commons.
The really strange thing from this observer's perspective is that the Conservative party didn't seem to mind accusing Liberal prime ministers Jean Chrétien and Paul Martin of being fully aware of the sponsorship scandal and where that money was going. Fascinating how quickly things change when the shoe is on the other foot.
If this suit is successful, we might as well throw out all the opposition parties and pretend that everything the government does is right and just and above board, and in our best interests. There should be no opposition because it just might lead to real discussions of issues that Canadians need to hear answers to.
Adam Mercer, Oshawa
Stephen Harper has finally made a mockery of our judicial system by using it for nothing more than to advance his own political agenda. The courts are notoriously backlogged and have much more important cases to rule on, like ones where parties are actually injured and need compensation. Harper may claim that the money left over from the award will be donated to charity, but this certainly cannot justify a waste of precious judicial resources.
Robert Kleinman, Toronto
Both the Conservatives and Liberals are expending excessive energy on trying to establish that the other is sleazier. As a taxpaying citizen, I can assure them that Canadians are now convinced there is more than enough sleaze to go around – both ways.
As a new strategy, perhaps they should consider providing good legislation and representation of constituents as an alternative to using Parliament as nothing more than a vehicle for furthering their own partisan interests.
If they'd rather play politics than serve the public, why doesn't one or the other "choose a trigger" and call an election so the Canadian public can play, too? Or are we not allowed in the game?
Randy Gostlin, Oshawa
Can someone explain to me how a parliamentary democracy is supposed to function when the Prime Minister sues the Leader of the Opposition for libel? This is not mere "libel chill," it's a thuggish assault on democracy.
Ryan Whyte, Toronto
Blue Helmet Bigotry By Doug Bandow
As predictable as the sun rising in the east, the United Nations has voted to assault religious liberty. Islam, however, is to be protected from criticism since Muslims are said to be under vicious attack in the West.The offending resolution, which denounces the “defamation of religions,” had its genesis in the UN Human Rights Council, created in 2006 to replace the long-discredited Commission on Human Rights. The inmates again have taken over the asylum as human rights violators joined the panel to insulate themselves from criticism. The only country certain to be denounced is Israel. (more…)
The Harper feds have a $14.2-billion surplus and you, the taxpayer, are going to get a whopping 15 bucks of it |
Mayor David Miller must have upchucked when he heard this news.
The Harper government has a $14.2-billion surplus and not only can Miller not have any of it, it's going straight onto the national debt which, since the Conservatives have been in Ottawa, is down to $467.3-billion from its peak of $562.9-billion.
But is this the right approach? There are varying views. Heaven knows this $14.2 billion could operate a lot of outdoor hockey rinks and community centres. Hell, we could build a wicked subway train system with that kind of scratch and maybe actually become an environmental leader in eliminating gridlock and smog.
Just $500 million of that surplus would be a lifejacket for a drowning Miller. But this is Prime Minister Stephen Harper we are talking about it. He's going to do the mature thing and throw this so-called tax surplus (I call it our money) on our national debt (which I call our national hangover).
"It used to be inevitable in life there was death and taxes," Harper said as he greeted a room full of equally boring suits at the Revenue Canada office on Front St. yesterday. "Today it's debt and taxes."
The guy is a barrel of laughs. His nickname from now on should be Chuckles. I have had more fun at funerals. Isn't there an advertising firm somewhere in Quebec you couldn't give some to.
toronto.ctv.ca
The only suspect charged with second-degree murder in the stabbing and beating death of a St. Catharines man in downtown Toronto has been granted bail.
Nicole Kish, the sole Canadian charged in the grisly slaying of 32-year-old Ross Hammond last month, was released on $165,000 bail on Tuesday night.
In honour of this being Labour Day and all, I thought you might want to check out the National Right to Work blog.
Contrary to the hardened heart they are not there because they want to be.
The next time you look at someone on a grate bundled in clothes realize that they are there for a reason. Had they the ability to cope or the intestinal fortitude to carry on, I am sure they would, and often do, dream of a different life.
Many remain outside for fear of violence within the shelter system. As is the case, the weak are preyed on physically, sexually and financially. Some commit petty crimes come winter for the safe haven of a penal institution. Generically known amongst them as “3 hots and a cot”.
Some 30 odd years ago I entered a hostel for the first time. Since then I have had the experience to visit virtually all in the downtown core.
Often the shelter system is the last house on the block. Some residents handle the suffering with grace, others with resentment. At one time alcohol was the predominant vice, but now the devil is crack. One social element that has not changed is mental illness. Some shelters are big and inherently more dangerous. Others can be smaller and spiritually based. In most cases, the staffs are very dedicated and special people.
Learning to sleep with your shoes tied to your bed, in a social and economic jail, I am sure is not what their mother envisioned for them..
And so, the builders, engraved, compelling words in stone. Above the passage entering Toronto’s largest shelter, the Seaton House, reads “Someone’s Father, Someone’s Brother, Someone’s Son”.
Prophetic words that urge us into service and “harden not our hearts”.


Renewed calls for a ban on panhandling are the predictable aftermath of the tragic slaying of Ross Hammond, a visitor from St. Catharines, after he refused to give money to four aggressive beggars. Two men and two women, all in their 20s and of no fixed address, have been arrested. And the public is justifiably outraged. Some politicians, such as Councillor Michael Thompson, are demanding a ban on panhandling.
That would be a mistake. The modest act of asking a passerby for help should not be turned into an offence.
What killed Hammond wasn't panhandling; it was a violent attack with a knife. That is already banned. As well as robbery and murder, aggressive panhandling is forbidden by law. The Safe Streets Act of 1999 makes it illegal to beg in a threatening or intimidating manner.
If the law is firmly enforced by police, and taken seriously by judges, it can provide meaningful protection from beggars who interfere with pedestrians and tourists. Flatly banning people from begging seems excessive, especially when it doesn't strike at the root of the problem.
People panhandle for many reasons. Many are hungry and need money for food. Others spend what they collect fuelling a drug or alcohol addiction. Still others beg rather than work. Whatever its motive, panhandling is a symptom of a broad social malaise. It is rooted in poverty, homelessness, mental illness, the curse of addictions and despair. People in the grip of those problems won't be saved by a ban on panhandling. In fact, in desperation, more just might resort to violence. That would be the worst possible outcome for Toronto.
Better enforcement of existing laws set up to protect the public should be coupled with renewed efforts to address the underlying problems afflicting many panhandlers. Providing more and better shelter for the homeless would be an obvious start.
In 2005, when city officials ruled that the homeless could no longer sleep in Nathan Phillips Square, they simultaneously adopted a strategy that found housing for hundreds of people under the Streets to Homes initiative. More such programs are needed. Many of those begging in the streets are mentally ill and would benefit from better access to treatment and social services. Finally, improved drug and alcohol addiction recovery programs could make a big difference in moving beggars off street corners and into productive jobs.
City council has wisely resisted repeated calls to ban panhandling. Toronto is currently engaged in assessing the needs of those who beg downtown and studying the impact of panhandlers on the city's businesses and tourist trade. This worthwhile effort, finishing next month, should provide a clear picture of those who accost passersby for change. It may even lead to new ways of addressing the problems that have pushed them into the street in the first place.