Saturday, May 09, 2009

It Is Our Job To Seperate Wheat From Chaff

How much for Don Martin?
How far will Don Martin go to smear the Conservatives and protect the Liberals? In his latest editorial Don Martin accuses the Conservatives for being behind this, and orchestrating the whole scandal.What is the proof he offers on this allegation? His thesis rests on the fact that the allegations came to light only a year later, Dhalla is a workaholic, and the Conservative candidate in that riding
Right As Rain

3 comments:

The Skinny said...

you'll have to excuse many for being just a little on the fence about this one. We do recall when Ralph Goodale was practically tarred, feathered, and hung, (not to mention it helped elect that lying sack of shit Harper) and then we found out the man was actually innocent, many many months later. But that didn't matter to Harper by then.

the 5 points:
1. The story break in the Toronto Star. Yes the Toronto Star, aka the Red Star. You know, that bastion of neo-con thought, practically the only newspaper to endorse the Liberals last election.

***oh my god that makes her GUILTY!!!!!

2. 3 different nannies have come forward. Yes three, not two as Don Martin had in his column.

*** you know what they say, when 3 or more people call you a horse... Giddyup...

3. Ruby Dhalla only speaks through a lawyer. I find that odd, honest people don't tend to speak through lawyers to media.

***oh my having a lawyer to defend you, makes you even MORE guilty. Fry her now.

4. Agatha Mason, executive director of Intercede, was quoted as saying she knew of more then 2 complainants. Read more here.

*** see the analogy about the horse

5. She resigned her post as critic. Again, I have to wonder why innocent people do that so quickly? Something must stink here.

*** yup see, whenever anyone steps away from a post to deal with the allegations, this is PROOF POSITIVE that she needs to be tarred and feathered right the fuck NOW. Case fucking closed right there.


See no need for investigations, courts, nada. When it's a liberalwe're talking about, smear her, drag her through the mud, destroy her, before she has a cahnce to try and defend herself. Ask Goodale all about it.

Oh I heard about a possible leak resulting in someone benefiting a lot of money, a possible leak from Flaherty or his office.

Nothing in the news about this it seems. But he's likely innocent, because he's a conservative.

Unhypentated Canadian said...

You make some valid points and many would be willing to discuss them until they read "helped elect that lying sack of shit Harper" which at the best is childess.

The Skinny said...

well you have excuse my reference to Harper, it's my opinion, as you have included many a colorful adjective to liberal and ndp leaders.

But it is widely known that the defamation of Goodale helped elect Harper into government, and that to me, right there, when someone gets elected on smearing an innocent man, is cause for some colorful adjectives.

About Me

My photo
I lean to the right but I still have a heart and if I have a mission it is to respond to attacks on people not available to protect themselves and to point out the hypocrisy of the left at every opportunity.MY MAJOR GOAL IS HIGHLIGHT THE HYPOCRISY AND STUPIDITY OF THE LEFTISTS ON TORONTO CITY COUNCIL. Last word: In the final analysis this blog is a relief valve for my rants/raves.

Blog Archive