Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Verrrry Interesting...

Chris Selley: Welcome to Canada. DuMaurier or Players?
Posted: February 23, 2010, 4:58 PM by NP Editor
 
The Toronto Star reports: "The more 'Canadian' immigrant children become, the more likely they are to smoke, a new study warns."
Things the Star doesn't report:
  • The data derive from a single study of grade 4, 5 and 6 students "in 24 elementary schools located in multiethnic inner-city neighborhoods" in Montreal, and "may not be generalizable to children other than those living in [such neighbourhoods]."
  • The data were collected in 1993. Since that time, overall smoking rates in Canada have fallen by more than a third, meaning the percentage of child smokers reported by the Star as if it was current — around 30% — is almost certainly wildly inflated.
  • The definition of a child who "smokes," as defined by the Montreal researchers in 1993 and as described in the new study: "Children who had smoked but not in the past year, those who had smoked a couple of times in the last year, and those who smoked each month, each week, or every day."
National Post
cselley@nationalpost.com

Chris Selley: Welcome to Canada. DuMaurier or Players?

Posted: February 23, 2010, 4:58 PM by NP Editor
Filed under: Full Pundit,Chris Selley
The Toronto Star reports: "The more 'Canadian' immigrant children become, the more likely they are to smoke, a new study warns."
Things the Star doesn't report:
  • The data derive from a single study of grade 4, 5 and 6 students "in 24 elementary schools located in multiethnic inner-city neighborhoods" in Montreal, and "may not be generalizable to children other than those living in [such neighbourhoods]."
  • The data were collected in 1993. Since that time, overall smoking rates in Canada have fallen by more than a third, meaning the percentage of child smokers reported by the Star as if it was current — around 30% — is almost certainly wildly inflated.
  • The definition of a child who "smokes," as defined by the Montreal researchers in 1993 and as described in the new study: "Children who had smoked but not in the past year, those who had smoked a couple of times in the last year, and those who smoked each month, each week, or every day."
National Post
cselley@nationalpost.com

Chris Selley: Welcome to Canada. DuMaurier or Players?

Posted: February 23, 2010, 4:58 PM by NP Editor
Filed under: Full Pundit,Chris Selley
The Toronto Star reports: "The more 'Canadian' immigrant children become, the more likely they are to smoke, a new study warns."
Things the Star doesn't report:
  • The data derive from a single study of grade 4, 5 and 6 students "in 24 elementary schools located in multiethnic inner-city neighborhoods" in Montreal, and "may not be generalizable to children other than those living in [such neighbourhoods]."
  • The data were collected in 1993. Since that time, overall smoking rates in Canada have fallen by more than a third, meaning the percentage of child smokers reported by the Star as if it was current — around 30% — is almost certainly wildly inflated.
  • The definition of a child who "smokes," as defined by the Montreal researchers in 1993 and as described in the new study: "Children who had smoked but not in the past year, those who had smoked a couple of times in the last year, and those who smoked each month, each week, or every day."
National Post
cselley@nationalpost.com

Chris Selley: Welcome to Canada. DuMaurier or Players?

Posted: February 23, 2010, 4:58 PM by NP Editor
Filed under: Full Pundit,Chris Selley
The Toronto Star reports: "The more 'Canadian' immigrant children become, the more likely they are to smoke, a new study warns."
Things the Star doesn't report:
  • The data derive from a single study of grade 4, 5 and 6 students "in 24 elementary schools located in multiethnic inner-city neighborhoods" in Montreal, and "may not be generalizable to children other than those living in [such neighbourhoods]."
  • The data were collected in 1993. Since that time, overall smoking rates in Canada have fallen by more than a third, meaning the percentage of child smokers reported by the Star as if it was current — around 30% — is almost certainly wildly inflated.
  • The definition of a child who "smokes," as defined by the Montreal researchers in 1993 and as described in the new study: "Children who had smoked but not in the past year, those who had smoked a couple of times in the last year, and those who smoked each month, each week, or every day."
National Post
cselley@nationalpost.com

No comments:

About Me

My photo
I lean to the right but I still have a heart and if I have a mission it is to respond to attacks on people not available to protect themselves and to point out the hypocrisy of the left at every opportunity.MY MAJOR GOAL IS HIGHLIGHT THE HYPOCRISY AND STUPIDITY OF THE LEFTISTS ON TORONTO CITY COUNCIL. Last word: In the final analysis this blog is a relief valve for my rants/raves.

Blog Archive