The Sandle Generation

If you trace the roots of a member of the looney, anti- everything, left wingnut, standing at the trough you will find that they wore sandals and spent most of their time smoking a joint and looking for free love. I don't necessarily agree with everything Read says but.........

Anti-Family; anti-Normalcy is now mainstream

The worst generation in modern history and its cultural Marxism.

-Craig Read

December 11th, 2006—Perhaps the worst generation in history are the largely narcissistic, moral relativists that dominate the 60s or the ‘boomer’ generation. A litany of erroneous beliefs, activism’s, social programs, and immoral constructs have been thrown up by this generation of warped, John Lennon wannabees.

This group subscribes fervently to cultural Marxism – the negation of Western culture and the imposition of utopia into all aspects of civilized life. Their political expression – socialism or liberalism in the USA – is as much a danger to our modern world as Islamic fascism.

The cultural Marxists and 60s John Lennon utopians have waged a fundamental war through the media; the educational systems and Hollywood against conservative and traditional values. On this fact there can be no dispute. Now we are witnessing the results across the West. Child-less couples; DINKS [double income no kids]; massive immigration from cultures that have little in common with our Western heritage and of course state programs to ‘resolve’ the difficulties of an overtaxed; declining population with yet more ‘incentives’ and ‘targeted program spending’. Cultural Marxism leads inevitably to statism.

The war against the traditional family has always been a core component of statism and Marxism. Any power center that challenges the elite from the family; to labor groups; to the private organization of capital; has to be either dismantled or micro-managed. So it goes with the ‘worst generation’ of aging hippies, free-love advocates and John Lennon true believers.

In harmony with the Russian communists who deigned to control all aspects of a family’s existence from income and jobs to education and social activities and in harmony with German fascists who micro-managed birth rates; sporting activities; clubs; and created the forerunner of the ‘post-modern’ welfare state; today’s cultural Marxists march along in lock step as sure of their moral superiority as the Russian Communists and Nazi’s were sure of theirs.

The traditional family and its roles of male and female are abhorrent to today’s marching cultural Marxists. Feminism, gay love, the morphing of women into either sex toys or imitations of men, along with the complete educational propaganda of anti-male, anti-Western drivel is de-rigueur for our modern socialist.

What is the result of massive government, high taxation and a neutering of traditional familial values? An astonishing and irreparable decline in birth rates; citizen apathy; civilisational cowardice and the onwards march of immigration and fascist Islam, both of which can either undermine or destroy the 1000 year heritage of our higher culture.

Consider the poster child for post-modern cultural Marxism – Canada. By the year 2015, for the first time in the history of Canadian population statistics, there will be more people over the age of 65 than under the age of 15. These projections predict fertility rates ranging from a low of 1.3 babies per woman to a high of 1.7 babies per woman. That puts Canada in line with other nations beset by declining fertility: France, 1.9; Australia, 1.7; Germany, 1.3; Italy and Spain, 1.2, Japan, 1.2; Korea, 1.1. This means of course: more government ‘programs’; more immigration; more taxation and more spend.

The 60s generation and their big government’s war on family and religion has thus reaped what it must have intended to sow – the reduction of religiosity and child bearing. By reducing the number of native births governments can then manage immigration and social policy to form the society they want. Massive Muslim immigration and the multi-cult club are of course priorities. Replacing ‘sick’ Judeo-Christianity and the modern world with a 9th century pagan fascism makes perfectly good sense to the anointed elite. It is also quite easy to manipulate and buy immigrant votes through welfare projects.

Instituting massive social schemes is what the 60s gang does best. As birth rates fall the government panics and institutes all sorts of nonsense to try and ‘resolve’ the issue they have created. By making moral virtue; religion; and civilisational pride optional the cultural Marxists have succeeded where political and military fascisms failed.

In any modern state the ‘initiatives’ to alleviate our neutered families is laughable. We have gay marriage and the establishment of a lifestyle that is anti-traditional family. We have ‘baby bonuses’ to pay for nanny’s or Filipina au-pere’s but no free market in day care to increase available supply. We have baby bonuses sent to mothers who have many babies outside of wedlock. We have redistribution of monies from wealthy voters to poorer voters and the creation of a welfare class. We have the redistribution of property rights from the man to the women making the man optional in raising children.

We have the massive taxation and accompanying economic stagnation; skyrocketing costs due to a lack of competition and efficiencies in health care, education and all government mismanaged programs – all ensures a notable role for the ‘elite’ to help ‘manage’ inequality. We have statism married to cultural Marxism.

As taxation and spend rocket upwards, the incentives to have children cascades downwards. It costs a minimum of $10.000 after tax per annum to raise a child in the typical urban center. This includes the costs of clothing, food, some sports and the costs of public education. Throw in private education, ballet lessons, acting classes, a violin, the latest and hottest clothing lines, MP3 players, X-box, a TV, a laptop and university education and the number will double or triple.

In a society where the average income is relatively modest and tax rates extremely immodest, it makes little or no economic sense to have children. With university now a standard path to higher incomes and also great debt assumption, it is not surprising that the average couple, in making some basic financial calculations, determines that maybe 1 child is enough.

It is hard to understand the chattering of the 60s generation who tell you that ‘times are a changing’ and that modern ‘values’ necessitates a childless multi-cultism. If our own society succumbs to such mind-numbing propaganda then we have only ourselves to blame. It is high time to reclaim the central role of the family and start to roll back government; cease non-Western immigration; and stop the erosion of virtues and spirituality.