Panhandler charged in senior's mugging free on bail
Updated Fri. Aug. 17 2007 12:00 PM ET
CTV.ca News Staff
The B.C. panhandler, who was arrested after an elderly churchgoer was roughed up and robbed, has been released from jail.
Darcy Jones has been granted bail and is now staying in Surrey, B.C., CTV British Columbia's Rob Brown reports.
4 comments:
he only thing really more sickening than this piece of trash being let back out on the streets is your incessant whining about 'pro panhandlers', and the insinuation that anyone, anyone who dares to perhaps approach this some semblance of reason might are all for this kind of disgusting acts of violence against a law abiding citizen, a generous one at that.
Congratulations on such commendable community service.
I suppose this will be filed under 'G' along with all the other comments that never got published. Or maybe this will make it with the other few that do.
At least I don't stoop to that on mine. I'm not chicken shit enough to do so.
The reason I don't publish a lot of your comments is that they don' make sense; ie: "approach this some semblance of reason might" or your personal comments; ie: "he only thing really more sickening" I don't have the time to make assumptions about what you are trying to say.
Also you have a habit of name calling when ever you don't agree with something....calling a person a moron is not something I would expect from an adult plus it is probably a violation of the human rights code as applied to those who are mentally challanged.
2 things.
I don't always necessarily check every letter of my comments. I assume the message might be more important. But some are hung up on other things. Forums are full of wannabe English teachers, just foaming at the mouth to jump on someone's missteps in typing. If there was an edit feature, like say on forums, perhaps this can be remedied to your satisfaction. Unfortunately, there wasn't so I had to leave it as it was. I think you got the idea however. I've seen some 'beauty' grammar here myself.
And the only real 'name calling' in my comment, was 'piece of trash', referring to the criminal. I didn't think you'd disagree with that. But it appears I was off on that one.
So no, you don't publish at least half of the comments, because you disagree with what they say. There has been quite a few I know of that were quite clear and never made it.
All I have to do is say you won't publish it, and like clockwork, you do.
who knows what'll happen to this one.
Post a Comment